Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGGR vs IJH: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to IJH's +13.2%; 2% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGGR and IJH

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $25.9bn for Capital Group Growth ETF and $122.8bn for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF.

At a glance
+2.6%
CGGR total return, 1 year
+13.2%
IJH total return, 1 year
0.39%
CGGR expense ratio
0.05%
IJH expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IJH costs 0.34 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.6 points; IJH is 4.7 times larger.

CGGR vs IJH: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGRIJH
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.6%+13.2%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Oct 6, 20266.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P MidCap 400
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.05%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$25.9bn$122.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common2%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund39.7%7.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 242 weekly returns
CGGR IJH
Return
Total return edge CGGR +91.6% +48.4%
Annualized edge CGGR +15.0% +8.9%
Price return edge CGGR +89.2% +38.7%
Risk
Volatility edge IJH 20.4% 18.2%
Max drawdown edge IJH −27.7% −21.0%
Downside capture 115.9% 99.6%
Beta 1.20 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge CGGR 0.58 0.33
Sortino edge CGGR 0.88 0.47
Treynor 0.098 0.092
Calmar edge CGGR 0.54 0.42
Against the benchmark
Alpha −1.0% a year +0.3% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.37 0.82
Information ratio 0.18 0.11
Tracking error 6.7% 1.7%

Each against its own benchmark: CGGR against VOO, Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026; IJH against MDY, Jun 2, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

CGGR returned more: +91.6% to +48.4%. IJH swung less: 18.2% to 20.4%. IJH fell less at its worst: −21.0% to −27.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: CGGR vs IJH: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGRIJHEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+91.6%+48.4%CGGRPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.0%+8.9%CGGRTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+89.2%+38.7%CGGRPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility20.4%18.2%IJHSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.5%12.6%IJH (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−27.7%−21.0%IJHDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture137.1%99.6%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture115.9%99.6%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.200.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.920.99Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.580.33CGGRReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.880.47CGGRReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0980.092Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.540.42CGGRAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOMDYThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−1.0% a year+0.3% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.370.82Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−6.3% to +4.3%−0.4% to +0.9%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.180.11Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error6.7%1.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 242 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

2%

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and IJH hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

2% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGGR IJH
Performance Food Group Co 0.90% 0.44%
Toast Inc 0.38% 0.48%
Aramark 0.38% 0.43%
Burlington Stores Inc 0.32% 0.43%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGGR
Meta Platforms Inc 5.38%
NVIDIA Corp 5.14%
Broadcom Inc 4.69%
Microsoft Corp 4.63%
Tesla Inc 4.19%
Micron Technology Inc 3.57%
Visa Inc 3.33%
Alphabet Inc 3.21%
Only in IJH
OKTA CLASS A 1.10%
TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.82%
UNITED THERAPEUTICS 0.74%
ENTEGRIS INC 0.67%
ATI 0.66%
US FOODS HOLDING 0.65%
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM 0.65%
XPO 0.64%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the S&P MidCap 400
Total return, 1 year +2.6% +13.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +12.8% (MDY)
Gap to its benchmark −11.1 pts vs VOO +0.4 pts vs MDY
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.05%
Already in the S&P 500 78.3% 0.0%
Holdings 96 409
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $25.9bn $122.8bn

CGGR and IJH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-232E624291

CGGR and IJH do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. CGGR follows No index, actively managed and IJH follows S&P MidCap 400.
  2. Holdings in common. 2% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and IJH +13.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.6 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IJH flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGGR

CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IJH

IJH tracks the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.2% with distributions reinvested, against +12.8% for its benchmark, the S&P MidCap 400. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 409 positions, with the top ten at 7.2%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or IJH?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and IJH +13.2%.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or IJH?
IJH is cheaper, by 0.34 percentage points a year. That is about $34 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGGR and IJH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 78% of CGGR and 0% of IJH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGGR against IJH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-ijh

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.