Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGGR vs SPUS: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to SPUS's +16.6%; 34% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGGR and SPUS
Net assets: $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $3.1bn on Aug 31, 2026 for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF.
Pair scorecard
CGGR costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.0 points.
| Measure | CGGR | SPUS |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.6% | +16.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.45% |
| Net assets, CGGR as of Oct 27, 2026 and SPUS as of Aug 31, 2026 | $25.9bn | $3.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 34% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | 56.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and SPUS hold 34% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.
half
34% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGGR and SPUS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR and SPUS are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. CGGR follows No index, actively managed and SPUS follows S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index.
- Holdings in common. 34% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and SPUS +16.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 14.0 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
SPUS
SPUS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Total Return Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 217 positions, with the top ten at 56.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or SPUS?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and SPUS +16.6%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or SPUS?
- CGGR is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against SPUS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-spus
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGGR against SPUS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-spus
[CGGR against SPUS (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-spus)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.