Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGGR vs SPHQ: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to SPHQ's +14.1%; 13% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGGR and SPHQ

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $25.9bn for Capital Group Growth ETF and $18.7bn for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF.

At a glance
+2.6%
CGGR total return, 1 year
+14.1%
SPHQ total return, 1 year
0.39%
CGGR expense ratio
0.15%
SPHQ expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SPHQ costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.5 points; CGGR is 1.4 times larger.

CGGR vs SPHQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGRSPHQ
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.6%+14.1%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Oct 6, 20266.4%, high on Jun 30, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P 500 Quality Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$25.9bn$18.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common13%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund39.7%43.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 242 weekly returns
CGGR SPHQ
Return
Total return edge CGGR (slight) +91.6% +82.5%
Annualized edge CGGR (slight) +15.0% +13.8%
Price return edge CGGR +89.2% +71.0%
Risk
Volatility edge SPHQ 20.4% 15.9%
Max drawdown edge SPHQ −27.7% −20.6%
Downside capture 115.9% 97.3%
Beta 1.20 0.94
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SPHQ (slight) 0.58 0.63
Sortino edge SPHQ (slight) 0.88 0.94
Treynor 0.098 0.097
Calmar edge SPHQ 0.54 0.67
Against the benchmark
Alpha −1.0% a year −0.5% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.37 −0.31
Information ratio 0.18 −0.15
Tracking error 6.7% 7.1%

Each against its own benchmark: CGGR against VOO, Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026; SPHQ against IVV, Dec 16, 2005 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

CGGR returned slightly more: +91.6% to +82.5%. SPHQ swung less: 15.9% to 20.4%. SPHQ fell less at its worst: −20.6% to −27.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: CGGR vs SPHQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGRSPHQEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+91.6%+82.5%CGGR (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.0%+13.8%CGGR (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+89.2%+71.0%CGGRPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility20.4%15.9%SPHQSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.5%10.6%SPHQLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−27.7%−20.6%SPHQDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture137.1%91.6%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture115.9%97.3%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.200.94Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.920.85Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.580.63SPHQ (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.880.94SPHQ (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0980.097Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.540.67SPHQAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−1.0% a year−0.5% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.37−0.31Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−6.3% to +4.3%−3.5% to +2.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.18−0.15Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error6.7%7.1%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 242 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

13%

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and SPHQ hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

13% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGGR SPHQ
Visa Inc 3.33% 6.23%
Apple Inc 2.29% 5.96%
Intuitive Surgical Inc 1.15% 1.58%
General Electric Co 1.05% 3.33%
Netflix Inc 0.97% 3.29%
KLA Corp 0.89% 2.03%
GE Vernova Inc 0.75% 3.81%
Costco Wholesale Corp 0.60% 4.24%
Applied Materials Inc 0.43% 2.09%
Mastercard Inc 0.43% 6.25%
Cisco Systems Inc 0.43% 3.65%
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc 0.88% 0.39%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGGR
Meta Platforms Inc 5.38%
NVIDIA Corp 5.14%
Broadcom Inc 4.69%
Microsoft Corp 4.63%
Tesla Inc 4.19%
Micron Technology Inc 3.57%
Alphabet Inc 3.21%
Alphabet Inc 3.06%
Only in SPHQ
Lam Research Corp 3.32%
Procter & Gamble Co 3.21%
QUALCOMM Inc 2.60%
Sandisk Corp 2.60%
Texas Instruments Inc 2.52%
Newmont Corp 1.77%
Fortinet Inc 1.68%
Progressive Corp 1.45%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the S&P 500 Quality
Total return, 1 year +2.6% +14.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark −11.1 pts vs VOO +0.4 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 78.3% 100.0%
Holdings 96 102
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $25.9bn $18.7bn

CGGR and SPHQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-57DF31FFD9

CGGR and SPHQ are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. CGGR follows No index, actively managed and SPHQ follows S&P 500 Quality Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 13% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and SPHQ +14.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.5 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

SPHQ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGGR

CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SPHQ

SPHQ tracks the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 102 positions, with the top ten at 43.3%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or SPHQ?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and SPHQ +14.1%.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or SPHQ?
SPHQ is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGGR and SPHQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 78% of CGGR and 100% of SPHQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGGR against SPHQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-sphq

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.