Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGGR vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to SCHX's +13.1%; 40% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGGR and SCHX

Net assets: $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $74.2bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF.

At a glance
+2.6%
CGGR total return, 1 year
+13.1%
SCHX total return, 1 year
0.39%
CGGR expense ratio
0.03%
SCHX expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHX costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.5 points.

CGGR vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGRSCHX
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.6%+13.1%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.03%
Net assets, CGGR as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHX as of Aug 31, 2026$25.9bn$74.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common40%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund39.7%36.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 242 weekly returns
CGGR SCHX
Return
Total return edge CGGR (slight) +91.6% +85.7%
Annualized edge CGGR (slight) +15.0% +14.2%
Price return edge CGGR +89.2% +74.2%
Risk
Volatility edge SCHX 20.4% 16.6%
Max drawdown edge SCHX −27.7% −21.0%
Downside capture 115.9% 100.5%
Beta 1.20 1.01
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SCHX (slight) 0.58 0.63
Sortino edge SCHX (slight) 0.88 0.95
Treynor 0.098 0.129
Calmar edge SCHX 0.54 0.68
Against the benchmark
Alpha −1.0% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.37 −0.62
Information ratio 0.18 −0.05
Tracking error 6.7% 0.9%

Each against its own benchmark: CGGR against VOO, Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHX against IVV, Nov 13, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

CGGR returned slightly more: +91.6% to +85.7%. SCHX swung less: 16.6% to 20.4%. SCHX fell less at its worst: −21.0% to −27.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: CGGR vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGRSCHXEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+91.6%+85.7%CGGR (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.0%+14.2%CGGR (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+89.2%+74.2%CGGRPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility20.4%16.6%SCHXSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.5%11.0%SCHXLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−27.7%−21.0%SCHXDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture137.1%100.5%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture115.9%100.5%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.201.01Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.921.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.580.63SCHX (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.880.95SCHX (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0980.129Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.540.68SCHXAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−1.0% a year−0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.37−0.62Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−6.3% to +4.3%−0.6% to +0.3%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.18−0.05Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error6.7%0.9%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 242 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

40%

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and SCHX hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

40% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGGR SCHX
NVIDIA Corp 5.14% 7.69%
Microsoft Corp 4.63% 5.42%
Alphabet Inc 3.21% 2.86%
Broadcom Inc 4.69% 2.52%
Amazon.com Inc 2.48% 3.66%
Apple Inc 2.29% 6.69%
Alphabet Inc 3.06% 2.28%
Meta Platforms Inc 5.38% 1.81%
Micron Technology Inc 3.57% 1.56%
Tesla Inc 4.19% 1.49%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.11% 1.32%
Visa Inc 3.33% 0.91%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGGR
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 2.54%
Shopify Inc 1.72%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 1.39%
ASML Holding NV 1.01%
SK hynix Inc 0.81%
Grupo Mexico SAB de CV 0.73%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp 0.73%
Glencore PLC 0.47%
Only in SCHX
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.37%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.33%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 1.10%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 0.96%
Johnson & Johnson 0.92%
Walmart Inc 0.66%
AbbVie Inc 0.65%
Palantir Technologies Inc 0.62%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap
Total return, 1 year +2.6% +13.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark −11.1 pts vs VOO −0.6 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 78.3% 93.6%
Holdings 96 747
Net assets, CGGR as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHX as of Aug 31, 2026 $25.9bn $74.2bn

CGGR and SCHX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-1D7FF85838

CGGR and SCHX are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. CGGR follows No index, actively managed and SCHX follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 40% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and SCHX +13.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.5 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGGR

CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHX

SCHX tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 747 positions, with the top ten at 36.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or SCHX?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and SCHX +13.1%.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or SCHX?
SCHX is cheaper, by 0.36 percentage points a year. That is about $36 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGGR and SCHX overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 78% of CGGR and 94% of SCHX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGGR against SCHX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-schx

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.