Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGGR vs MODL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to MODL's +11.7%; 38% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGGR and MODL
Net assets: $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $1.0bn on Jun 30, 2026 for VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF.
Pair scorecard
CGGR costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.1 points.
| Measure | CGGR | MODL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.6% | +11.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.46% |
| Net assets, CGGR as of Oct 27, 2026 and MODL as of Jun 30, 2026 | $25.9bn | $1.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 38% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | 32.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and MODL hold 38% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
38% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGGR and MODL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR and MODL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 38% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and MODL +11.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 9.1 points.
- Number of holdings. CGGR holds 96 positions and MODL holds 363.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
MODL
MODL is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +11.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 363 positions, with the top ten at 32.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or MODL?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and MODL +11.7%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or MODL?
- CGGR is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against MODL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-modl
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGGR against MODL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-modl
[CGGR against MODL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-modl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.