Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGGR vs GUSA: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to GUSA's +13.0%; 40% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGGR and GUSA
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $25.9bn for Capital Group Growth ETF and $2.4bn for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF.
Pair scorecard
GUSA costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.4 points; CGGR is 10.8 times larger.
| Measure | CGGR | GUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.6% | +13.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Solactive GBS United States 1000 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.10% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $25.9bn | $2.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 40% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | 34.8% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and GUSA hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.
half
40% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGGR and GUSA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR and GUSA are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. CGGR follows No index, actively managed and GUSA follows Solactive GBS United States 1000 Index.
- Holdings in common. 40% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and GUSA +13.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.4 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
GUSA
GUSA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,006 positions, with the top ten at 34.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or GUSA?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and GUSA +13.0%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or GUSA?
- GUSA is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against GUSA, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-gusa
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGGR against GUSA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-gusa
[CGGR against GUSA (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-gusa)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.