Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGGR vs EMB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to EMB's −0.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGGR and EMB

Net assets: $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $13.2bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF.

At a glance
+2.6%
CGGR total return, 1 year
−0.4%
EMB total return, 1 year
0.39%
CGGR expense ratio
0.39%
EMB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.39% a year; their one-year returns differ by 3.0 points; CGGR is 2.0 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

CGGR vs EMB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGREMB
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.6%−0.4%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Oct 6, 20263.5%, high on Jun 29, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedJ.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.39%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$25.9bn$13.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight78%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund39.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 242 weekly returns
CGGR EMB
Return
Total return edge CGGR +91.6% +22.6%
Annualized edge CGGR +15.0% +4.5%
Price return edge CGGR +89.2% −3.1%
Risk
Volatility edge EMB 20.4% 8.9%
Max drawdown edge EMB −27.7% −18.5%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge CGGR 0.58 0.06
Sortino edge CGGR 0.88 0.09
Calmar edge CGGR 0.54 0.24
Reading

CGGR returned more: +91.6% to +22.6%. EMB swung less: 8.9% to 20.4%. EMB fell less at its worst: −18.5% to −27.7%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: CGGR vs EMB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGREMBEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+91.6%+22.6%CGGRPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.0%+4.5%CGGRTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+89.2%−3.1%CGGRPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility20.4%8.9%EMBSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.5%6.3%EMBLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−27.7%−18.5%EMBDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.580.06CGGRReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.880.09CGGRReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.540.24CGGRAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 242 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and EMB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGGR EMB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGGR
Meta Platforms Inc 5.38%
NVIDIA Corp 5.14%
Broadcom Inc 4.69%
Microsoft Corp 4.63%
Tesla Inc 4.19%
Micron Technology Inc 3.57%
Visa Inc 3.33%
Alphabet Inc 3.21%
Only in EMB
ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 1.08%
ECUADOR REPUBLIC OF (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.76%
ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 0.65%
ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 0.64%
GHANA (REPUBLIC OF) DISCO RegS 0.56%
URUGUAY (ORIENTAL REPUBLIC OF) 0.54%
ARGENTINA REPUBLIC OF GOVERNMENT 0.52%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL RegS 0.52%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond
Total return, 1 year +2.6% −0.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −11.1 pts vs VOO not measured
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.39%
Holdings 96 622
Net assets, CGGR as of Oct 27, 2026 and EMB as of Oct 28, 2026 $25.9bn $13.2bn

CGGR and EMB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-97728A7EB4

CGGR and EMB do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. CGGR follows No index, actively managed and EMB follows J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and EMB −0.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.0 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EMB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGGR

CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

EMB

EMB tracks the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. It sat 3.5% below its high of Jun 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or EMB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and EMB −0.4%.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or EMB?
Neither: CGGR and EMB both charge 0.39% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGGR against EMB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-emb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.