Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGGR vs DFUS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to DFUS's +13.8%; 38% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGGR and DFUS

Net assets: $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $20.9bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF.

At a glance
+2.6%
CGGR total return, 1 year
+13.8%
DFUS total return, 1 year
0.39%
CGGR expense ratio
0.09%
DFUS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

DFUS costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.2 points.

CGGR vs DFUS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGRDFUS
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.6%+13.8%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.09%
Net assets, CGGR as of Oct 27, 2026 and DFUS as of Jul 31, 2026$25.9bn$20.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common38%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund39.7%34.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 242 weekly returns
CGGR DFUS
Return
Total return edge CGGR (slight) +91.6% +86.7%
Annualized edge CGGR (slight) +15.0% +14.4%
Price return edge CGGR +89.2% +76.4%
Risk
Volatility edge DFUS 20.4% 16.6%
Max drawdown edge DFUS −27.7% −20.4%
Downside capture 115.9% 99.4%
Beta 1.20 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge DFUS (slight) 0.58 0.64
Sortino edge DFUS (slight) 0.88 0.96
Treynor 0.098 0.094
Calmar edge DFUS 0.54 0.70
Against the benchmark
Alpha −1.0% a year +0.8% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.37 2.33
Information ratio 0.18 1.04
Tracking error 6.7% 0.8%

Each against its own benchmark: CGGR against VOO, Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026; DFUS against IWV, Jun 25, 2021 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

CGGR returned slightly more: +91.6% to +86.7%. DFUS swung less: 16.6% to 20.4%. DFUS fell less at its worst: −20.4% to −27.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: CGGR vs DFUS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGRDFUSEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+91.6%+86.7%CGGR (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.0%+14.4%CGGR (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+89.2%+76.4%CGGRPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility20.4%16.6%DFUSSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.5%11.0%DFUSLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−27.7%−20.4%DFUSDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture137.1%101.4%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture115.9%99.4%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.201.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.921.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.580.64DFUS (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.880.96DFUS (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0980.094Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.540.70DFUSAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOIWVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−1.0% a year+0.8% a yearCGGR not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.372.33Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−6.3% to +4.3%+0.1% to +1.5%CGGR includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.181.04Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error6.7%0.8%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 242 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

38%

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and DFUS hold 38% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

38% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGGR DFUS
NVIDIA Corp 5.14% 6.75%
Microsoft Corp 4.63% 4.99%
Alphabet Inc 3.21% 3.00%
Broadcom Inc 4.69% 2.63%
Amazon.com Inc 2.48% 3.83%
Alphabet Inc 3.06% 2.48%
Apple Inc 2.29% 6.45%
Meta Platforms Inc 5.38% 1.77%
Micron Technology Inc 3.57% 1.35%
Tesla Inc 4.19% 1.27%
Visa Inc 3.33% 0.88%
Intel Corp 1.08% 0.62%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGGR
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 2.54%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.11%
Shopify Inc 1.72%
Welltower Inc 1.67%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 1.39%
Strategy Inc 1.15%
ASML Holding NV 1.01%
SK hynix Inc 0.81%
Only in DFUS
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 1.38%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 1.37%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 1.33%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 1.12%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORPORATION 0.94%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.90%
WALMART INC. 0.71%
ABBVIE INC. 0.64%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +2.6% +13.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +13.3% (IWV)
Gap to its benchmark −11.1 pts vs VOO +0.5 pts vs IWV
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.09%
Already in the S&P 500 78.3% 89.4%
Holdings 96 2236
Net assets, CGGR as of Oct 27, 2026 and DFUS as of Jul 31, 2026 $25.9bn $20.9bn

CGGR and DFUS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-468201C153

CGGR and DFUS are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Holdings in common. 38% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and DFUS +13.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.2 points.
  3. Number of holdings. CGGR holds 96 positions and DFUS holds 2236.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGGR

CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

DFUS

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.

DFUS is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 89% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,236 positions, with the top ten at 34.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or DFUS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and DFUS +13.8%.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or DFUS?
DFUS is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGGR and DFUS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 78% of CGGR and 89% of DFUS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGGR against DFUS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-dfus

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.