Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGDV vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGDV returned +15.8% to VONG's +1.1%; 35% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGDV and VONG

Net assets: $39.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF, and $47.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+15.8%
CGDV total return, 1 year
+1.1%
VONG total return, 1 year
0.33%
CGDV expense ratio
0.06%
VONG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VONG costs 0.27 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.7 points; VONG is 1.2 times larger.

CGDV vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGDVVONG
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.8%+1.1%
Drawdown
Below its high3.6%, high on Aug 13, 20264.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedRussell 1000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.33%0.06%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$38.4bn$47.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common35%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.0%57.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 242 weekly returns
CGDV VONG
Return
Total return edge CGDV +107.2% +90.1%
Annualized edge CGDV +16.9% +14.8%
Price return edge CGDV (slight) +93.0% +84.2%
Risk
Volatility edge CGDV 14.8% 20.6%
Max drawdown edge CGDV −21.1% −25.3%
Downside capture 88.1% 99.8%
Beta 0.93 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge CGDV 0.85 0.57
Sortino edge CGDV 1.28 0.87
Treynor 0.134 0.151
Calmar edge CGDV 0.80 0.58
Against the benchmark
Alpha +4.4% a year +0.2% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.70 0.76
Information ratio 0.68 0.11
Tracking error 5.6% 1.0%

Each against its own benchmark: CGDV against IWD, Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026; VONG against IWF, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

CGDV returned more: +107.2% to +90.1%. CGDV swung less: 14.8% to 20.6%. CGDV fell less at its worst: −21.1% to −25.3%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: CGDV vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGDVVONGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+107.2%+90.1%CGDVPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+16.9%+14.8%CGDVTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+93.0%+84.2%CGDV (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility14.8%20.6%CGDVSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation9.8%13.4%CGDVLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−21.1%−25.3%CGDVDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture93.8%99.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture88.1%99.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.930.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.861.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.850.57CGDVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.280.87CGDVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1340.151Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.800.58CGDVAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWDIWFThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+4.4% a year+0.2% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.700.76Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.7% to +9.4%−0.3% to +0.7%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.680.11Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.6%1.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 242 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

35%

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and VONG hold 35% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

35% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGDV VONG
NVIDIA Corp 6.32% 15.63%
Microsoft Corp 7.64% 5.59%
Broadcom Inc 4.67% 4.79%
Meta Platforms Inc 4.27% 3.83%
Alphabet Inc 3.55% 5.88%
Apple Inc 2.21% 7.65%
Eli Lilly & Co 1.91% 2.71%
Mastercard Inc 1.51% 1.31%
Applied Materials Inc 1.85% 1.19%
General Electric Co 3.05% 0.95%
Micron Technology Inc 0.80% 3.52%
Oracle Corp 3.22% 0.69%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGDV
RTX Corp 3.16%
Comcast Corp 2.61%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.60%
Carrier Global Corp 2.36%
British American Tobacco PLC 2.26%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.19%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 2.08%
Linde PLC 1.92%
Only in VONG
Alphabet Inc 4.75%
Tesla Inc 3.04%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.92%
Visa Inc 1.69%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.22%
Lam Research Corp 1.21%
Caterpillar Inc 1.08%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 0.94%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the Russell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year +15.8% +1.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +27.5% (IWD) +0.9% (IWF)
Gap to its benchmark −11.7 pts vs IWD +0.2 pts vs IWF
Expense ratio 0.33% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 91.7% 95.5%
Holdings 53 373
Net assets, CGDV as of Oct 27, 2026 and VONG as of Sep 30, 2026 $39.1bn $47.1bn

CGDV and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-5E785029E3

CGDV and VONG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. CGDV follows No index, actively managed and VONG follows Russell 1000 Growth Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 35% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGDV returned +15.8% and VONG +1.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 14.7 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGDV

CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VONG

VONG tracks the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +0.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 373 positions, with the top ten at 57.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or VONG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +15.8% and VONG +1.1%.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or VONG?
VONG is cheaper, by 0.27 percentage points a year. That is about $27 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGDV and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of CGDV and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGDV against VONG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-vong

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.