IQ

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGDV vs SLV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

CGDV is an actively managed equity fund and SLV a commodity fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGDV returned +15.8% against +14.9%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGDV and SLV

Net assets: $39.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF, and $26.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Silver Trust.

CGDV on its own →SLV on its own →
At a glance
+15.8%
CGDV total return, 1 year
+14.9%
SLV total return, 1 year
0.33%
CGDV expense ratio
0.50%
SLV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

CGDV costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.9 points; CGDV is 1.5 times larger.

CGDV vs SLV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGDVSLV
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.8%+14.9%
Drawdown
Below its high3.6%, high on Aug 13, 202653.5%, high on Jan 28, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedSilver
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.33%0.50%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$39.1bn$26.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight92%
Holdings datedAug 31, 2026
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.0%

Method

Side by side

CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF SLV iShares Silver Trust
Where it sits Stock ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer Capital Group iShares
What it is Actively managed Holds silver
Total return, 1 year +15.8% +14.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +27.5% (IWD) +15.0% (SIVR)
Gap to its benchmark −11.7 pts vs IWD −0.1 pts vs SIVR
Expense ratio 0.33% 0.50%
Holdings 53 not counted
Net assets, CGDV as of Oct 27, 2026 and SLV as of Oct 28, 2026 $39.1bn $26.9bn

CGDV and SLV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

SLV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGDV

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SLV

Its expense ratio is 0.50% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

SLV holds silver. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.9% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the price of silver. It sat 53.5% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or SLV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +15.8% and SLV +14.9%.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or SLV?
CGDV is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Other comparisons
CGDV vs GLDMCGDV vs IAUCGDV vs GLDCGDV vs SIVRDGRO vs SLVSLV vs VYMIWD vs SLVSCHD vs SLV
Where to next
CGDV on its own →SLV on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →CGDV dividend history →CGDV holdings →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
CGDV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
CGDV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
Capital Group page for CGDV ↗
iShares page for SLV ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGDV against SLV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-slv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.