Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
CGDV vs SECT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, CGDV returned +18.3% to SECT's +13.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGDV and SECT
Net assets: $39.0bn on Nov 3, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF, and $2.8bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Main Sector Rotation ETF.
Pair scorecard
CGDV costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.2 points.
| Measure | CGDV | SECT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +18.3% | +13.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.3%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | 3.0%, high on Aug 13, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.69% |
| Net assets, CGDV as of Nov 3, 2026 and SECT as of Jul 31, 2026 | $39.0bn | $2.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42.0% | 99.6% |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and SECT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGDV and SECT on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +18.3% with distributions reinvested, against +32.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.3% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Nov 4, 2026.
SECT
SECT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.69% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 99.6%. It sat 3.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Nov 4, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or SECT?
- In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.3% and SECT +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or SECT?
- CGDV is cheaper, by 0.36 percentage points a year. That is about $36 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGDV against SECT, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-sect
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). CGDV against SECT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-sect
[CGDV against SECT (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-sect)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.