A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

CGCB vs UITB: Differences, Returns & Fees

On Jun 30, 2026 CGCB's duration was 6.3 years and UITB's 5.6; CGCB charges 0.27% to UITB's 0.38%. Net assets: $6.5bn on Oct 8, 2026 for Capital Group Core Bond ETF, and $2.7bn on Jun 30, 2026 for VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF.

CGCB costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; CGCB is 2.1 times larger.

CGCBUITB
Expense ratio0.27%0.38%
Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026$5.6bn$2.7bn
Total return, 1 year−1.7%−1.6%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common3%
Below its high4.4%, high on Feb 27, 20264.2%, high on Feb 27, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

−1.7%
CGCB total return, 1 year
−1.6%
UITB total return, 1 year
0.27%
CGCB expense ratio
0.38%
UITB expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGCB and UITB hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

half

3% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CGCB UITB
U.S. Treasury Bonds, due Aug 15, 2055 0.70% 0.38%
U.S. Treasury Bonds, due May 15, 2045 0.32% 0.49%
U.S. Treasury Bonds, due May 15, 2055 0.78% 0.30%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due May 31, 2032 0.19% 2.13%
U.S. Treasury Bonds, due Nov 15, 2054 0.38% 0.17%
U.S. Treasury Bonds, due May 15, 2040 1.25% 0.16%
U.S. Treasury Bonds, due Feb 15, 2053 0.51% 0.15%
U.S. Treasury Bonds, due Nov 15, 2044 0.14% 0.88%
U.S. Treasury Bonds, due Aug 15, 2050 0.18% 0.13%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Oct 31, 2031 0.13% 0.26%
U.S. Treasury Bonds, due Nov 15, 2040 1.19% 0.13%
BX Trust 2025-VOLT, due Dec 15, 2044 0.16% 0.09%
Only in CGCB
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 2.84%
Bank of America Corp, due Feb 7, 2030 1.32%
Fannie Mae Pool, due Mar 1, 2052 1.27%
U.S. Treasury Bonds, due May 15, 2045 1.19%
Fannie Mae Pool, due Mar 1, 2052 1.19%
Baxter International Inc, due Dec 1, 2028 1.06%
U.S. Treasury Bonds, due Nov 15, 2049 1.03%
JPMorgan Chase & Co, due Jul 23, 2029 1.02%
Only in UITB
U S TREASURY NOTE, due Aug 15, 2034 2.03%
U S TREASURY NOTE, due Nov 15, 2032 1.94%
U S TREASURY NOTE, due Nov 15, 2033 1.86%
U S TREASURY NOTE, due May 15, 2033 1.71%
U S TREASURY NOTE, due May 15, 2035 1.54%
U S TREASURY NOTE, due Mar 15, 2029 1.17%
U S TREASURY NOTE, due Sep 30, 2032 1.04%
U S TREASURY NOTE, due Aug 15, 2032 1.02%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

CGCB
Capital Group Core Bond ETF
UITB
VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
Issuer Capital Group VictoryShares
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year −1.7% −1.6%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −19.0 pts −18.9 pts
Expense ratio 0.27% 0.38%
Holdings 764 1181
Net assets, CGCB as of Oct 8, 2026 and UITB as of Jun 30, 2026 $6.5bn $2.7bn

CGCB and UITB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CGCB in plain words

CGCB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.7% with distributions reinvested, against −1.6% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.27% a year. It sat 4.4% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

UITB in plain words

UITB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.38% a year. It sat 4.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGCB or UITB?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGCB returned −1.7% and UITB −1.6%.
Which is cheaper, CGCB or UITB?
CGCB is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
CGCB vs TAGGCGCB vs SCCRCGCB vs EAGGCGCB vs UNIYUITB vs VCRBJHCR vs UITBSCCR vs UITBUITB vs UNIY
CGCB on its own →UITB on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
CGCB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CGCB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Capital Group page for CGCB ↗UITB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗UITB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGCB against UITB, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcb-vs-uitb

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.