CGCB vs SCCR: Differences, Returns & Fees
On Jun 30, 2026 CGCB's duration was 6.3 years and SCCR's 5.8; SCCR charges 0.16% to CGCB's 0.27%. Net assets: $6.5bn on Oct 8, 2026 for Capital Group Core Bond ETF, and $1.5bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Schwab Core Bond ETF.
SCCR costs 0.11 points a year less; both returned −1.7% over a year; CGCB is 3.7 times larger.
| CGCB | SCCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.27% | 0.16% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $5.6bn | $1.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | −1.7% | −1.7% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 3% | |
| Below its high | 4.4%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | 4.5%, high on Feb 27, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGCB and SCCR hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
half
3% in common
On the same fields
CGCB and SCCR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGCB in plain words
CGCB is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.27% a year. It sat 4.4% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.7% with distributions reinvested, against −1.6% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index.
SCCR in plain words
SCCR is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.16% a year. It sat 4.5% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.7% with distributions reinvested, against −1.6% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGCB or SCCR?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGCB returned −1.7% and SCCR −1.7%.
- Which is cheaper, CGCB or SCCR?
- SCCR is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGCB against SCCR, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcb-vs-sccr
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CGCB against SCCR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcb-vs-sccr
[CGCB against SCCR (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcb-vs-sccr)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.