Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGBL vs VT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGBL returned +7.1% to VT's +13.5%; 22% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGBL and VT
Net assets: $7.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF, and $81.8bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total World Stock Index ETF.
Pair scorecard
VT costs 0.27 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.4 points; VT is 10.6 times larger.
| Measure | CGBL | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +7.1% | +13.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | FTSE Global All Cap Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.06% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $7.7bn | $81.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 22% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 59.3% | 22.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and VT hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
22% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGBL and VT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +7.5% for its benchmark, the 60%/40% S&P 500 Index/Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index.
CGBL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.3%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
VT
VT tracks an index of Total World Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10,194 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or VT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +7.1% and VT +13.5%.
- Which is cheaper, CGBL or VT?
- VT is cheaper, by 0.27 percentage points a year. That is about $27 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGBL against VT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-vt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGBL against VT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-vt
[CGBL against VT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-vt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.