Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGBL vs QUAL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGBL returned +7.1% to QUAL's +13.1%; 13% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGBL and QUAL
Net assets: $7.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF, and $48.2bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF.
Pair scorecard
QUAL costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.0 points; QUAL is 6.1 times larger.
| Measure | CGBL | QUAL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +7.1% | +13.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $7.9bn | $48.3bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 13% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 59.3% | 44.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and QUAL hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
13% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGBL and QUAL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +7.5% for its benchmark, the 60%/40% S&P 500 Index/Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index.
CGBL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.3%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
QUAL
QUAL tracks the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 119 positions, with the top ten at 44.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or QUAL?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +7.1% and QUAL +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, CGBL or QUAL?
- QUAL is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGBL against QUAL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-qual
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGBL against QUAL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-qual
[CGBL against QUAL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-qual)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.