Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGBL vs JNK: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGBL returned +7.1% to JNK's +1.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGBL and JNK

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $7.9bn for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and $5.9bn for State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF.

At a glance
+7.1%
CGBL total return, 1 year
+1.7%
JNK total return, 1 year
0.33%
CGBL expense ratio
0.40%
JNK expense ratio

Pair scorecard

CGBL costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.4 points; CGBL is 1.3 times larger.

CGBL vs JNK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGBLJNK
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.1%+1.7%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedBloomberg High Yield Very Liquid Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.33%0.40%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$7.9bn$5.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight48%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund59.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 6, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 159 weekly returns
CGBL JNK
Return
Total return edge CGBL +55.6% +26.8%
Annualized edge CGBL +15.6% +8.1%
Price return edge CGBL +46.8% +3.9%
Risk
Volatility edge JNK 10.4% 4.9%
Max drawdown edge JNK −10.0% −3.8%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge CGBL 1.02 0.70
Sortino edge CGBL 1.58 1.14
Calmar edge JNK 1.55 2.12
Reading

CGBL returned more: +55.6% to +26.8%. JNK swung less: 4.9% to 10.4%. JNK fell less at its worst: −3.8% to −10.0%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: CGBL vs JNK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGBLJNKEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+55.6%+26.8%CGBLPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.6%+8.1%CGBLTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+46.8%+3.9%CGBLPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility10.4%4.9%JNKSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation6.7%3.0%JNKLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−10.0%−3.8%JNKDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe1.020.70CGBLReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.581.14CGBLReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar1.552.12JNKAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 159 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and JNK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGBL JNK
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGBL
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.27%
Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.64%
Broadcom Inc 4.58%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 3.49%
Alphabet Inc 2.79%
Micron Technology Inc 2.23%
Philip Morris International Inc 2.07%
Apple Inc 2.01%
Only in JNK
1261229 BC LTD SR SECURED 144A 04/32 10 0.65%
MERIDIAN ARC HOLDCO LLC SR SECURED 144A 04/31 6.25 0.53%
QUIKRETE HOLDINGS INC SR SECURED 144A 03/32 6.375 0.46%
ECHOSTAR CORP SR SECURED 11/29 10.75 0.45%
SOFTBANK GROUP CORP SR UNSECURED 144A 04/32 9.25 0.44%
SOFTBANK GROUP CORP SR UNSECURED 144A 04/34 9.75 0.43%
PR RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 SR SECURED 144A 05/31 6.5 0.42%
VENTURE GLOBAL LNG INC SR SECURED 144A 02/29 9.5 0.42%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF JNK State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF
Where it sits Allocation ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the Bloomberg High Yield Bond
Total return, 1 year +7.1% +1.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +7.5% (VOO and AGG) −1.4% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark −0.4 pts vs VOO and AGG +3.1 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.33% 0.40%
Holdings 77 1142
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $7.9bn $5.9bn

CGBL and JNK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.

Alert

JNK flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGBL

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +7.5% for its benchmark, the 60%/40% S&P 500 Index/Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index.

CGBL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.3%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

JNK

JNK tracks the Bloomberg High Yield Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.7% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or JNK?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +7.1% and JNK +1.7%.
Which is cheaper, CGBL or JNK?
CGBL is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGBL against JNK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-jnk

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.