Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGBL vs FBCG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGBL returned +7.1% to FBCG's +9.5%; 22% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGBL and FBCG
Net assets: $7.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF, and $7.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
CGBL costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.4 points.
| Measure | CGBL | FBCG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +7.1% | +9.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | 5.7%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.57% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $7.7bn | $7.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 22% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 59.3% | 57.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Oct 6, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 159 weekly returnsFBCG returned more: +102.5% to +55.6%. CGBL swung less: 10.4% to 21.6%. CGBL fell less at its worst: −10.0% to −26.7%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | CGBL | FBCG | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +55.6% | +102.5% | FBCG | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +15.6% | +25.9% | FBCG | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +46.8% | +102.1% | FBCG | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 10.4% | 21.6% | CGBL | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 6.7% | 13.9% | CGBL | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −10.0% | −26.7% | CGBL | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 1.02 | 0.97 | CGBL (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.58 | 1.51 | CGBL (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 1.55 | 0.97 | CGBL | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 159 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and FBCG hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
22% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGBL and FBCG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGBL and FBCG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- Holdings in common. 22% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGBL returned +7.1% and FBCG +9.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.4 points.
- Cost. CGBL charges 0.33% of assets a year and FBCG 0.57%, a gap of 0.24 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +7.5% for its benchmark, the 60%/40% S&P 500 Index/Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index.
CGBL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.3%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
FBCG
FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or FBCG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +7.1% and FBCG +9.5%.
- Which is cheaper, CGBL or FBCG?
- CGBL is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGBL against FBCG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-fbcg
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGBL against FBCG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-fbcg
[CGBL against FBCG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-fbcg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.