Which returned more over the last year, BWET or VPL?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5129.6% and VPL returned +36.9%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BWET or VPL?

BWET charges 0.15% a year and VPL charges 0.07%, so VPL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BWET vs VPL: how they differ

BWET is a commodity fund and VPL an equity index fund, and over the year BWET returned more, +5129.6% against +36.9%.

Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF and Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund.

BWET and VPL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	VPL Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Breakwave	Vanguard
What it is	Tanker Shipping	Pacific Stock
Total return, 1 year	+5129.6%	+36.9%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+5112.1 pts	+19.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.07%
Holdings	not filed	2335

BWET in plain words

BWET is a commodity fund tracking the Tanker Shipping. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5129.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

VPL in plain words

VPL is an index equity fund tracking the Pacific Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +36.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2335 positions, with the top ten at 21.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or VPL?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5129.6% and VPL returned +36.9%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BWET or VPL?: BWET charges 0.15% a year and VPL charges 0.07%, so VPL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BWET against VPL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BWET against VPL, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-vpl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources