Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BWET vs KRE: Differences, Returns & Fees
BWET is a commodity futures fund and KRE an equity index fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BWET returned +5,121.7% against +21.2%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BWET and KRE
Net assets: $178m on Oct 28, 2026 for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF, and $4.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF.
Pair scorecard
KRE costs 4.33 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5100.5 points; KRE is far larger, $4.0bn against $186m.
| Measure | BWET | KRE |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +5,121.7% | +21.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 11.2%, high on Oct 8, 2026 | 6.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Tanker freight futures | S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 4.68% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $186m | $4.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 7% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 11.6% | |
Risk and return
May 12, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 180 weekly returnsBWET returned more: +5,753.7% to +120.0%. KRE swung less: 27.1% to 87.4%. KRE fell less at its worst: −26.4% to −55.9%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | BWET | KRE | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +5,753.7% | +120.0% | BWET | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +224.0% | +25.6% | BWET | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +5,753.7% | +99.2% | BWET | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 87.4% | 27.1% | KRE | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 40.2% | 17.4% | KRE | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −55.9% | −26.4% | KRE | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 1.71 | 0.81 | BWET | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 3.72 | 1.26 | BWET | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 4.01 | 0.97 | BWET | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 180 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
BWET and KRE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for BWET.
Its expense ratio is 4.68%, for the year to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-K states.
BWET holds tanker freight futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5,121.7% with distributions reinvested. It sat 11.2% below its high of Oct 8, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
KRE
KRE tracks the S&P Regional Banking. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 167 positions, with the top ten at 11.6%. It sat 6.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BWET or KRE?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and KRE +21.2%.
- Which is cheaper, BWET or KRE?
- KRE is cheaper, by 4.33 percentage points a year. That is about $433 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BWET against KRE, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-kre
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BWET against KRE. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-kre
[BWET against KRE (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-kre)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.