Which returned more over the last year, BWET or HGER?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and HGER +46.9%.

Which is cheaper, BWET or HGER?

HGER is cheaper, by 4.00 percentage points a year. That is about $400 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

BWET vs HGER: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

BWET is a commodity futures fund and HGER an equity index fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BWET returned +5,121.7% against +46.9%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BWET and HGER

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $178m for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF and $5.0bn for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF.

BWET on its own →HGER on its own →

At a glance

+5,121.7%

BWET total return, 1 year

+46.9%

HGER total return, 1 year

4.68%

BWET expense ratio

0.68%

HGER expense ratio

Pair scorecard

HGER costs 4.00 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5074.8 points; HGER is far larger, $5.0bn against $178m.

BWET vs HGER: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	BWET	HGER
Return
Measure	BWET	HGER
Total return, 1 year	+5,121.7%	+46.9%
Drawdown
Measure	BWET	HGER
Below its high	11.2%, high on Oct 8, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	BWET	HGER
What it tracks	Tanker freight futures	Quantix Commodity Index
Cost and size
Measure	BWET	HGER
Expense ratio	4.68%	0.68%
Net assets	$178m	$5.0bn
Holdings
Measure	BWET	HGER
Holdings in common	not published
In the S&P 500, by weight		0%
Holdings dated		Jul 31, 2026

Method

Side by side

BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF

Issuer Breakwave Harbor

What it is Holds tanker freight futures Tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy

Total return, 1 year +5,121.7% +46.9%

Expense ratio 4.68% 0.68%

Holdings not counted 0

Net assets $178m $5.0bn

BWET and HGER on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

BWET

Its expense ratio is 4.68%, for the year to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-K states.

BWET holds tanker freight futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5,121.7% with distributions reinvested. It sat 11.2% below its high of Oct 8, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

HGER

HGER tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +46.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.68% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 0 positions, with the top ten at not published.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or HGER?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and HGER +46.9%.
Which is cheaper, BWET or HGER?: HGER is cheaper, by 4.00 percentage points a year. That is about $400 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Other comparisons

BWET vs PDBC BWET vs SIVR BWET vs USO BWET vs SLV HGER vs USO HGER vs SIVR HGER vs SLV GLDM vs HGER

Where to next

BWET on its own →HGER on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →HGER dividend history →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

Breakwave page for BWET ↗

HGER filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

HGER prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Harbor page for HGER ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BWET against HGER, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-hger

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.