Which returned more over the last year, BWET or EZU?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5129.6% and EZU returned +18.0%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BWET or EZU?

BWET charges 0.15% a year and EZU charges 0.50%, so BWET is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BWET vs EZU: how they differ

BWET is a commodity fund and EZU an equity index fund, and over the year BWET returned more, +5129.6% against +18.0%.

Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF.

BWET and EZU on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Breakwave	iShares
What it is	Tanker Shipping	MSCI Eurozone
Total return, 1 year	+5129.6%	+18.0%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+5112.1 pts	+0.5 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.50%
Holdings	not filed	220

BWET in plain words

BWET is a commodity fund tracking the Tanker Shipping. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5129.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

EZU in plain words

EZU is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Eurozone. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 220 positions, with the top ten at 30.0%. It sat 3.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or EZU?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5129.6% and EZU returned +18.0%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BWET or EZU?: BWET charges 0.15% a year and EZU charges 0.50%, so BWET is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BWET against EZU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BWET against EZU, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-ezu Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources