Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BWET vs EMB: Differences, Returns & Fees
BWET is a commodity futures fund and EMB a bond index fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BWET returned +5,121.7% against −0.4%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BWET and EMB
Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $178m for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF and $13.2bn for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
EMB costs 4.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5122.1 points; EMB is far larger, $13.2bn against $178m.
| Measure | BWET | EMB |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +5,121.7% | −0.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 11.2%, high on Oct 8, 2026 | 3.5%, high on Jun 29, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Tanker freight futures | J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 4.68% | 0.39% |
| Net assets | $178m | $13.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Risk and return
May 12, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 180 weekly returnsBWET returned more: +5,753.7% to +28.6%. EMB swung less: 7.0% to 87.4%. EMB fell less at its worst: −7.3% to −55.9%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | BWET | EMB | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +5,753.7% | +28.6% | BWET | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +224.0% | +7.5% | BWET | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +5,753.7% | +7.6% | BWET | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 87.4% | 7.0% | EMB | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 40.2% | 4.7% | EMB | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −55.9% | −7.3% | EMB | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 1.71 | 0.42 | BWET | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 3.72 | 0.63 | BWET | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 4.01 | 1.03 | BWET | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 180 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
BWET and EMB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for BWET.
Its expense ratio is 4.68%, for the year to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-K states.
BWET holds tanker freight futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5,121.7% with distributions reinvested. It sat 11.2% below its high of Oct 8, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
EMB
EMB tracks the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Jun 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BWET or EMB?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and EMB −0.4%.
- Which is cheaper, BWET or EMB?
- EMB is cheaper, by 4.29 percentage points a year. That is about $429 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BWET against EMB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-emb
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BWET against EMB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-emb
[BWET against EMB (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-emb)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.