IQ

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BWET vs CGDV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

BWET is a commodity futures fund and CGDV an actively managed equity fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BWET returned +5,121.7% against +15.8%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BWET and CGDV

Net assets: $178m on Oct 28, 2026 for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF, and $39.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF.

BWET on its own →CGDV on its own →
At a glance
+5,121.7%
BWET total return, 1 year
+15.8%
CGDV total return, 1 year
4.68%
BWET expense ratio
0.33%
CGDV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

CGDV costs 4.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5105.9 points; CGDV is far larger, $38.9bn against $186m.

BWET vs CGDV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBWETCGDV
Return
Total return, 1 year+5,121.7%+15.8%
Drawdown
Below its high11.2%, high on Oct 8, 20263.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksTanker freight futuresNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio4.68%0.33%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$186m$38.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight92%
Holdings datedAug 31, 2026
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.0%

Method

Side by side

BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF
Issuer Breakwave Capital Group
What it is Holds tanker freight futures Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +5,121.7% +15.8%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +27.5% (IWD)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −11.7 pts vs IWD
Expense ratio 4.68% 0.33%
Holdings not counted 53
Net assets, BWET as of Oct 28, 2026 and CGDV as of Oct 27, 2026 $178m $39.1bn

BWET and CGDV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

BWET flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BWET

Its expense ratio is 4.68%, for the year to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-K states.

BWET holds tanker freight futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5,121.7% with distributions reinvested. It sat 11.2% below its high of Oct 8, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

CGDV

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or CGDV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and CGDV +15.8%.
Which is cheaper, BWET or CGDV?
CGDV is cheaper, by 4.35 percentage points a year. That is about $435 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Other comparisons
BWET vs DGROBWET vs VYMBWET vs IWDBWET vs SCHDCGDV vs USOCGDV vs SIVRCGDV vs SLVCGDV vs GLDM
Where to next
BWET on its own →CGDV on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →CGDV dividend history →CGDV holdings →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
Breakwave page for BWET ↗
CGDV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
CGDV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
Capital Group page for CGDV ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BWET against CGDV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-cgdv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.