Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BSV vs CGGR: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BSV returned +1.0% to CGGR's +2.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BSV and CGGR
Net assets: $45.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF, and $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
BSV costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.6 points; BSV is 1.7 times larger.
| Measure | BSV | CGGR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +1.0% | +2.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.39% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $45.4bn | $26.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 78% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BSV and CGGR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BSV and CGGR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BSV
BSV tracks an index of Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BSV or CGGR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.0% and CGGR +2.6%.
- Which is cheaper, BSV or CGGR?
- BSV is cheaper, by 0.36 percentage points a year. That is about $36 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BSV against CGGR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-cggr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BSV against CGGR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-cggr
[BSV against CGGR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-cggr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.