Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BSCT vs IBDV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

BSCT's duration was 2.7 years on May 31, 2026 and IBDV's 3.4 on Jul 31, 2026; both charge 0.10%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BSCT and IBDV

Net assets: $3.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF, and $3.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF.

At a glance
+1.3%
BSCT total return, 1 year
+0.1%
IBDV total return, 1 year
0.10%
BSCT expense ratio
0.10%
IBDV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.10% a year; their one-year returns differ by 1.2 points; IBDV is 1.1 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

BSCT vs IBDV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBSCTIBDV
Return
Total return, 1 year+1.3%+0.1%
Benchmark
What it tracksInvesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2029 IndexBloomberg December 2030 Maturity Corporate Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.10%0.10%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$3.1bn$3.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jul 2, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 329 weekly returns
BSCT IBDV
Return
Total return edge BSCT +7.5% +4.8%
Annualized edge BSCT +1.1% +0.7%
Price return edge BSCT −14.1% −16.5%
Risk
Volatility edge BSCT 5.1% 5.9%
Max drawdown edge BSCT −18.8% −21.4%
Downside capture 95.9% 106.2%
Beta 1.16 1.09
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge BSCT (slight) −0.36 −0.37
Sortino edge BSCT (slight) −0.49 −0.50
Treynor −0.003 −0.020
Calmar edge BSCT 0.06 0.03
Against the benchmark
Alpha +2.0% a year +0.9% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.04 1.23
Information ratio 0.32 0.34
Tracking error 5.2% 1.9%

Each against its own benchmark: BSCT against AGG, Sep 20, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026; IBDV against IUSB, Jul 2, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

BSCT returned more: +7.5% to +4.8%. BSCT swung less: 5.1% to 5.9%. BSCT fell less at its worst: −18.8% to −21.4%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: BSCT vs IBDV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBSCTIBDVEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+7.5%+4.8%BSCTPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+1.1%+0.7%BSCTTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−14.1%−16.5%BSCTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility5.1%5.9%BSCTSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation3.8%4.4%BSCTLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−18.8%−21.4%BSCTDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture105.0%113.3%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture95.9%106.2%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.161.09Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.640.91Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe−0.36−0.37BSCT (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino−0.49−0.50BSCT (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor−0.003−0.020Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.060.03BSCTAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkAGGIUSBThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+2.0% a year+0.9% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.041.23Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−1.8% to +5.8%−0.5% to +2.3%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.320.34Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.2%1.9%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 329 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BSCT and IBDV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BSCT IBDV
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BSCT
AbbVie Inc., due Nov 21, 2029 1.27%
Salesforce, Inc., due Mar 15, 2029 1.04%
International Business Machines Corp., due May 15, 2029 0.77%
Centene Corp., due Dec 15, 2029 0.77%
Verizon Communications Inc., due Dec 3, 2029 0.73%
AT&T Inc., due Mar 1, 2029 0.73%
Amazon.com, Inc., due Mar 13, 2029 0.73%
Oracle Corp., due Feb 4, 2029 0.72%
Only in IBDV
T-Mobile USA Inc, due Apr 15, 2030 1.16%
Boeing Co/The, due May 1, 2030 0.74%
Deutsche Telekom International Finance BV, due Jun 15, 2030 0.66%
Meta Platforms Inc, due Nov 15, 2030 0.62%
British Telecommunications Ltd, due Dec 15, 2030 0.56%
Pacific Gas and Electric Co, due Jul 1, 2030 0.52%
Pfizer Investment Enterprises Pte Ltd, due May 19, 2030 0.51%
AT&T Inc, due Feb 15, 2030 0.50%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BSCT Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF IBDV iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +1.3% +0.1%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) −1.2% (IUSB)
Gap to its benchmark +2.7 pts vs AGG +1.3 pts vs IUSB
Expense ratio 0.10% 0.10%
Holdings 509 735
Net assets, BSCT as of Oct 27, 2026 and IBDV as of Oct 28, 2026 $3.1bn $3.4bn

BSCT and IBDV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-2FEB66108E

BSCT and IBDV are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. BSCT follows Invesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2029 Index and IBDV follows Bloomberg December 2030 Maturity Corporate Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BSCT returned +1.3% and IBDV +0.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 1.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

BSCT and IBDV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BSCT

BSCT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

IBDV

IBDV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSCT or IBDV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSCT returned +1.3% and IBDV +0.1%.
Which is cheaper, BSCT or IBDV?
Neither: BSCT and IBDV both charge 0.10% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BSCT against IBDV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsct-vs-ibdv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.