Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IBDV vs IBDW: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

On Jul 31, 2026 IBDV's duration was 3.4 years and IBDW's 4.2; both charge 0.10%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IBDV and IBDW

Net assets: $3.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF, and $2.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF.

At a glance
+0.1%
IBDV total return, 1 year
−0.6%
IBDW total return, 1 year
0.10%
IBDV expense ratio
0.10%
IBDW expense ratio

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.10% a year; their one-year returns differ by 0.7 points; IBDV is 1.3 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

IBDV vs IBDW: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIBDVIBDW
Return
Total return, 1 year+0.1%−0.6%
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg December 2030 Maturity Corporate IndexBloomberg December 2031 Maturity Corporate Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.10%0.10%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$3.4bn$2.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jul 2, 2021 to Oct 23, 2026 · 277 weekly returns · each against IUSB
IBDV IBDW
Return
Total return edge IBDV +2.8% +0.5%
Annualized edge IBDV +0.5% +0.1%
Price return edge IBDV −16.5% −19.8%
Risk
Volatility edge IBDV 6.1% 6.9%
Max drawdown edge IBDV −20.8% −23.3%
Downside capture 101.3% 114.3%
Beta 1.06 1.21
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie −0.49 −0.49
Sortino edge Tie −0.66 −0.65
Treynor −0.028 −0.028
Calmar edge IBDV 0.02 0.00
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.7% a year +0.9% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.98 1.13
Information ratio 0.29 0.06
Tracking error 1.7% 2.1%
Reading

IBDV returned more: +2.8% to +0.5%. IBDV swung less: 6.1% to 6.9%. IBDV fell less at its worst: −20.8% to −23.3%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IBDV vs IBDW: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIBDVIBDWIUSBEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+2.8%+0.5%IBDVPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+0.5%+0.1%IBDVTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−16.5%−19.8%IBDVPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility6.1%6.9%IBDVSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation4.6%5.2%IBDVLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−20.8%−23.3%IBDVDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture105.3%120.9%100.0%IBDWShare of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture101.3%114.3%100.0%IBDVShare of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.061.211.00IBDV lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.920.931.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe−0.49−0.49TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino−0.66−0.65TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor−0.028−0.028−0.035TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.020.00IBDVAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIUSBIUSBIUSBThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.7% a year+0.9% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.981.13Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.7% to +2.2%−0.6% to +2.4%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.290.06IBDVReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.7%2.1%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 277 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IBDV and IBDW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IBDV IBDW
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IBDV
T-Mobile USA Inc, due Apr 15, 2030 1.16%
Boeing Co/The, due May 1, 2030 0.74%
Deutsche Telekom International Finance BV, due Jun 15, 2030 0.66%
Meta Platforms Inc, due Nov 15, 2030 0.62%
British Telecommunications Ltd, due Dec 15, 2030 0.56%
Pacific Gas and Electric Co, due Jul 1, 2030 0.52%
Pfizer Investment Enterprises Pte Ltd, due May 19, 2030 0.51%
AT&T Inc, due Feb 15, 2030 0.50%
Only in IBDW
Space Exploration Technologies Corp, due Jul 15, 2031 1.00%
NVIDIA Corp, due Jun 15, 2031 0.97%
Amazon.com Inc, due Mar 13, 2031 0.79%
Salesforce Inc, due Sep 15, 2031 0.75%
Oracle Corp, due Feb 4, 2031 0.72%
Verizon Communications Inc, due Mar 21, 2031 0.71%
Amazon.com Inc, due Jul 9, 2031 0.70%
Meta Platforms Inc, due May 15, 2031 0.62%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IBDV iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF IBDW iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +0.1% −0.6%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.2% (IUSB) −1.2% (IUSB)
Gap to its benchmark +1.3 pts vs IUSB +0.6 pts vs IUSB
Expense ratio 0.10% 0.10%
Holdings 735 669
Net assets, IBDV as of Oct 28, 2026 and IBDW as of Oct 27, 2026 $3.4bn $2.7bn

IBDV and IBDW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-127197E6FD

IBDV and IBDW are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. IBDV follows Bloomberg December 2030 Maturity Corporate Index and IBDW follows Bloomberg December 2031 Maturity Corporate Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IBDV returned +0.1% and IBDW −0.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.7 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IBDV and IBDW flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IBDV

IBDV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

IBDW

IBDW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.6% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IBDV or IBDW?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBDV returned +0.1% and IBDW −0.6%.
Which is cheaper, IBDV or IBDW?
Neither: IBDV and IBDW both charge 0.10% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IBDV against IBDW, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibdv-vs-ibdw

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.