Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BSCT vs IBDU: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

BSCT's duration was 2.7 years on May 31, 2026 and IBDU's 2.6 on Jul 31, 2026; both charge 0.10%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BSCT and IBDU

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $3.1bn for Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF and $4.0bn for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF.

At a glance
+1.3%
BSCT total return, 1 year
+1.3%
IBDU total return, 1 year
0.10%
BSCT expense ratio
0.10%
IBDU expense ratio

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.10% a year; both returned +1.3% over a year; IBDU is 1.3 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

BSCT vs IBDU: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBSCTIBDU
Return
Total return, 1 year+1.3%+1.3%
Benchmark
What it tracksInvesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2029 IndexBloomberg December 2029 Maturity Corporate Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.10%0.10%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$3.1bn$4.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common74%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Sep 27, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026 · 369 weekly returns
BSCT IBDU
Return
Total return edge Tie +16.2% +16.3%
Annualized edge Tie +2.1% +2.1%
Price return edge BSCT −9.1% −10.3%
Risk
Volatility edge IBDU (slight) 8.6% 8.3%
Max drawdown edge Tie −18.8% −18.9%
Downside capture 95.9% 100.2%
Beta 1.16 1.21
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge BSCT (slight) −0.05 −0.05
Sortino edge Tie −0.06 −0.06
Treynor −0.003 −0.003
Calmar edge Tie 0.11 0.11
Against the benchmark
Alpha +2.0% a year +1.7% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.04 1.21
Information ratio 0.32 0.34
Tracking error 5.2% 3.9%

Each against its own benchmark: BSCT against AGG, Sep 20, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026; IBDU against IUSB, Sep 27, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

BSCT and IBDU returned about the same: +16.2% and +16.3%. IBDU swung slightly less: 8.3% to 8.6%. BSCT and IBDU fell about the same at their worst: −18.8% and −18.9%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: BSCT vs IBDU: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBSCTIBDUEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+16.2%+16.3%TiePrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+2.1%+2.1%TieTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−9.1%−10.3%BSCTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility8.6%8.3%IBDU (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation6.4%6.4%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−18.8%−18.9%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture105.0%109.0%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture95.9%100.2%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.161.21Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.640.80Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe−0.05−0.05BSCT (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino−0.06−0.06TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor−0.003−0.003Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.110.11TieAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkAGGIUSBThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+2.0% a year+1.7% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.041.21Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−1.8% to +5.8%−1.1% to +4.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.320.34Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.2%3.9%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 369 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

74%

By the books each fund has filed, BSCT and IBDU hold 74% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

74% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BSCT IBDU
AbbVie Inc., due Nov 21, 2029 1.27% 0.97%
Salesforce, Inc., due Mar 15, 2029 1.04% 0.73%
Verizon Communications Inc., due Dec 3, 2029 0.73% 0.63%
International Business Machines Corp., due May 15, 2029 0.77% 0.61%
Oracle Corp., due Feb 4, 2029 0.72% 0.58%
AT&T Inc., due Mar 1, 2029 0.73% 0.58%
Amazon.com, Inc., due Mar 13, 2029 0.73% 0.58%
Fiserv, Inc., due Jul 1, 2029 0.70% 0.57%
Anheuser Busch InBev Worldwide Inc., due Jan 23, 2029 0.72% 0.56%
AbbVie Inc., due Mar 15, 2029 0.62% 0.50%
Cisco Systems, Inc., due Feb 26, 2029 0.62% 0.49%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc., due Jul 16, 2029 0.58% 0.49%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BSCT
Centene Corp., due Dec 15, 2029 0.77%
Broadcom Inc., due Jul 12, 2029 0.56%
SBA Communications Corp., due Feb 1, 2029 0.35%
Toronto-Dominion Bank (The), due Dec 17, 2029 0.25%
BlackRock, Inc., due Apr 30, 2029 0.24%
Comcast Corp., due Jan 15, 2029 0.22%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc., due Feb 15, 2029 0.17%
Comcast Corp., due Jun 1, 2029 0.16%
Only in IBDU
NVIDIA Corp, due Jun 15, 2029 0.56%
Amazon.com Inc, due Jul 9, 2029 0.49%
Fox Corp, due Jan 25, 2029 0.37%
CVS Health Corp, due Aug 15, 2029 0.34%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co, due Jul 26, 2029 0.32%
Broadcom Inc, due Apr 15, 2029 0.32%
Suzano Austria GmbH, due Jan 15, 2029 0.30%
Honeywell Aerospace Inc, due Mar 16, 2029 0.28%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BSCT Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF IBDU iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +1.3% +1.3%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) −1.2% (IUSB)
Gap to its benchmark +2.7 pts vs AGG +2.5 pts vs IUSB
Expense ratio 0.10% 0.10%
Holdings 509 729
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $3.1bn $4.0bn

BSCT and IBDU on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-27C831B021

BSCT and IBDU are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. BSCT follows Invesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2029 Index and IBDU follows Bloomberg December 2029 Maturity Corporate Index.
  2. Holdings in common (similar). 74% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BSCT returned +1.3% and IBDU +1.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.0 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

BSCT and IBDU flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BSCT

BSCT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

IBDU

IBDU tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSCT or IBDU?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSCT returned +1.3% and IBDU +1.3%.
Which is cheaper, BSCT or IBDU?
Neither: BSCT and IBDU both charge 0.10% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BSCT against IBDU, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsct-vs-ibdu

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.