Which returned more over the last year, BSCR or TBLL?

In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSCR returned +3.3% and TBLL +3.6%.

Which is cheaper, BSCR or TBLL?

TBLL is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF

Compare their flows Ask IQ about these two funds

BSCR vs TBLL: Differences, Returns & Fees

On May 31, 2026 BSCR's duration was 1.0 years and TBLL's 0.3; TBLL charges 0.08% to BSCR's 0.10%. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $4.5bn for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF and $2.6bn for Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about BSCR and TBLL

Answers cite the figures on this page.

TBLL costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points; BSCR is 1.7 times larger.

BSCR vs TBLL: Differences, Returns & Fees
	BSCR	TBLL
Expense ratio	0.10%	0.08%
Net assets	$4.5bn	$2.6bn
Total return, 1 year	+3.3%	+3.6%
What it tracks	not read by ETFIQ	ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026.

+3.3%

BSCR total return, 1 year

+3.6%

TBLL total return, 1 year

0.10%

BSCR expense ratio

0.08%

TBLL expense ratio

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-4E658CE2AB

BSCR and TBLL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

What each follows. BSCR follows not read by ETFIQ and TBLL follows ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index.
Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026).
Number of holdings. BSCR holds 481 positions and TBLL holds 93.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BSCR and TBLL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding BSCR TBLL

Only in BSCR

Microsoft Corp., due Feb 6, 2027 0.88%

Citigroup Inc., due Sep 29, 2027 0.85%

Amazon.com, Inc., due Aug 22, 2027 0.77%

Morgan Stanley, due Jan 20, 2027 0.66%

Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The), due Jan 26, 2027 0.66%

Oracle Corp., due Nov 15, 2027 0.60%

Meta Platforms, Inc., due Aug 15, 2027 0.58%

Wells Fargo & Co., due Jul 22, 2027 0.55%

Only in TBLL

U.S. Treasury Bills, due Jun 18, 2026 2.79%

U.S. Treasury Bills, due Jun 4, 2026 2.68%

U.S. Treasury Bills, due Jun 25, 2026 2.65%

U.S. Treasury Bills, due Jul 2, 2026 2.62%

U.S. Treasury Bills, due Jul 9, 2026 2.57%

U.S. Treasury Bills, due Jul 16, 2026 2.30%

U.S. Treasury Bills, due Sep 3, 2026 2.23%

U.S. Treasury Bills, due Oct 29, 2026 2.15%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

BSCR

Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF

TBLL

Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF

Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF

Issuer Invesco Invesco

What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index

Total return, 1 year +3.3% +3.6%

Its benchmark over the same days not measured +3.6% (TRSY)

Gap to its benchmark not measured 0.0 pts vs TRSY

Expense ratio 0.10% 0.08%

Holdings 481 93

Net assets $4.5bn $2.6bn

BSCR and TBLL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About BSCR

BSCR tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

About TBLL

TBLL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested, against +3.6% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSCR or TBLL?: In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSCR returned +3.3% and TBLL +3.6%.
Which is cheaper, BSCR or TBLL?: TBLL is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

BSCR vs RAVI BSCR vs IBDR BSCR vs IBTH BSCR vs CLIP TBLL vs VNLA FLRN vs TBLL FTSM vs TBLL TBLL vs TFLO

BSCR on its own →TBLL on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →BSCR dividend history →BSCR holdings →TBLL dividend history →TBLL holdings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

BSCR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BSCR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Invesco page for BSCR ↗TBLL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗TBLL prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Invesco page for TBLL ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BSCR against TBLL, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscr-vs-tbll

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.