Which returned more over the last year, BSCR or GBIL?

In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSCR returned +3.3% and GBIL +3.6%.

Which is cheaper, BSCR or GBIL?

BSCR is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF

Compare their flows Ask IQ about these two funds

BSCR vs GBIL: Differences, Returns & Fees

On May 31, 2026 BSCR's duration was 1.0 years and GBIL's 0.4; BSCR charges 0.10% to GBIL's 0.12%. Net assets: $4.5bn on Oct 20, 2026 for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF, and $7.9bn on Oct 19, 2026 for Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about BSCR and GBIL

Answers cite the figures on this page.

BSCR costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points; GBIL is 1.7 times larger.

BSCR vs GBIL: Differences, Returns & Fees
	BSCR	GBIL
Expense ratio	0.10%	0.12%
Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026	$4.5bn	$7.9bn
Total return, 1 year	+3.3%	+3.6%
What it tracks	not read by ETFIQ	not read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026.

+3.3%

BSCR total return, 1 year

+3.6%

GBIL total return, 1 year

0.10%

BSCR expense ratio

0.12%

GBIL expense ratio

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-BF2B1968AA

BSCR and GBIL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026).
Number of holdings. BSCR holds 481 positions and GBIL holds 43.
What each follows (similar). Both follow not read by ETFIQ.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BSCR and GBIL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding BSCR GBIL

Only in BSCR

Microsoft Corp., due Feb 6, 2027 0.88%

Citigroup Inc., due Sep 29, 2027 0.85%

Amazon.com, Inc., due Aug 22, 2027 0.77%

Morgan Stanley, due Jan 20, 2027 0.66%

Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The), due Jan 26, 2027 0.66%

Oracle Corp., due Nov 15, 2027 0.60%

Meta Platforms, Inc., due Aug 15, 2027 0.58%

Wells Fargo & Co., due Jul 22, 2027 0.55%

Only in GBIL

B 0 08/27/26, due Aug 27, 2026 9.32%

B 0 09/22/26, due Sep 22, 2026 7.64%

WIB 0 07/16/26, due Jul 16, 2026 6.33%

B 0 07/21/26, due Jul 21, 2026 6.33%

T 4.125 01/31/27, due Jan 31, 2027 4.67%

T 3.5 09/30/26, due Sep 30, 2026 3.84%

T 3.875 03/31/27, due Mar 31, 2027 3.67%

T 3.75 04/30/27, due Apr 30, 2027 3.67%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

BSCR

Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF

GBIL

Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF

Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF

Issuer Invesco Goldman Sachs

What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index

Total return, 1 year +3.3% +3.6%

Expense ratio 0.10% 0.12%

Holdings 481 43

Net assets, BSCR as of Oct 20, 2026 and GBIL as of Oct 19, 2026 $4.5bn $7.9bn

BSCR and GBIL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About BSCR

BSCR tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

About GBIL

GBIL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.12% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSCR or GBIL?: In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSCR returned +3.3% and GBIL +3.6%.
Which is cheaper, BSCR or GBIL?: BSCR is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

BSCR vs FTSM BSCR vs VUSB BSCR vs FLOT BSCR vs VBIL GBIL vs TFLO GBIL vs TBIL GBIL vs IBTH GBIL vs ICSH

BSCR on its own →GBIL on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →BSCR dividend history →BSCR holdings →GBIL dividend history →GBIL holdings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

BSCR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BSCR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Invesco page for BSCR ↗GBIL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗GBIL prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Goldman Sachs website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BSCR against GBIL, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscr-vs-gbil

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.