Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOXX vs REMX: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOXX returned +4.0% to REMX's −19.2%, and BOXX charges 0.19% to REMX's 0.53%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOXX and REMX

Net assets: $14.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF, and $1.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF.

At a glance
+4.0%
BOXX total return, 1 year
−19.2%
REMX total return, 1 year
0.19%
BOXX expense ratio
0.53%
REMX expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BOXX costs 0.34 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 23.2 points; BOXX is 9.6 times larger.

BOXX vs REMX: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBOXXREMX
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.0%−19.2%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high75.1%, high on Apr 11, 2011
Against its benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedRare earth and critical materials
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 32.6 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.19%0.53%
Net assets, as of Oct 23, 2026$14.4bn$1.5bn
Active share vs the S&P 500100%
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight9%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund61%

Method

Side by side

BOXX Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Thematic ETF
What it is Actively managed Rare earth and critical materials
Total return, 1 year +4.0% −19.2%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.4% (ACWI)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −32.6 pts vs ACWI
Expense ratio 0.19% 0.53%
Holdings not counted 32
Net assets, BOXX as of Oct 28, 2026 and REMX as of Oct 27, 2026 $14.5bn $1.5bn

BOXX and REMX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

REMX flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOXX

BOXX is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year.

REMX

By weight, 9% of REMX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 32 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −19.2% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 32.6 pts. It sits 75.1% below its all-time high of Apr 11, 2011.

Questions people ask

Are BOXX and REMX in the same category?
BOXX is a bond ETF and REMX is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, BOXX or REMX?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOXX returned +4.0% and REMX −19.2%.
Which is cheaper, BOXX or REMX?
BOXX is cheaper, by 0.34 percentage points a year. That is about $34 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOXX against REMX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/boxx-vs-remx

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.