Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs VDC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to VDC's +12.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and VDC

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $7.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
+12.7%
VDC total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.09%
VDC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VDC costs 0.45 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.1 points.

BOND vs VDC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDVDC
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+12.7%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 20263.1%, high on Oct 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Consumer Staples 25/50
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.09%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and VDC as of Sep 30, 2026$8.3bn$7.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight86%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund66.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 9, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026 · 763 weekly returns
BOND VDC
Return
Total return edge VDC +47.4% +307.6%
Annualized edge VDC +2.7% +10.1%
Price return edge VDC −12.6% +184.3%
Risk
Volatility edge BOND 4.9% 13.2%
Max drawdown edge BOND −19.5% −22.9%
Downside capture 95.5% 99.6%
Beta 0.97 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VDC 0.21 0.66
Sortino edge VDC 0.28 0.93
Treynor 0.010 0.075
Calmar edge VDC 0.14 0.44
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.9% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 2.05 0.27
Information ratio 0.53 0.04
Tracking error 1.7% 0.7%

Each against its own benchmark: BOND against AGG, Mar 9, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026; VDC against FSTA, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VDC returned more: +307.6% to +47.4%. BOND swung less: 4.9% to 13.2%. BOND fell less at its worst: −19.5% to −22.9%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: BOND vs VDC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDVDCEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+47.4%+307.6%VDCPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+2.7%+10.1%VDCTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−12.6%+184.3%VDCPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility4.9%13.2%BONDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation3.6%9.4%BONDLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−19.5%−22.9%BONDDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture102.2%99.4%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture95.5%99.6%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.971.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.881.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.210.66VDCReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.280.93VDCReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0100.075Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.140.44VDCAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkAGGFSTAThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.9% a year+0.1% a yearVDC not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat2.050.27Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range0.0% to +1.7%−0.3% to +0.4%VDC includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.530.04Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.7%0.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 763 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and VDC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND VDC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in VDC
Walmart Inc 13.86%
Costco Wholesale Corp 12.12%
Procter & Gamble Co 9.90%
Coca-Cola Co 9.80%
Philip Morris International Inc 4.83%
PepsiCo Inc 4.28%
Altria Group Inc 3.86%
Mondelez International Inc 2.58%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Consumer Staples
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +12.7%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) +12.7% (FSTA)
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG 0.0 pts vs FSTA
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.09%
Holdings 1565 105
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and VDC as of Sep 30, 2026 $8.3bn $7.4bn

BOND and VDC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-B1E6295D2D

BOND and VDC do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. BOND follows No index, actively managed and VDC follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Consumer Staples 25/50.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BOND returned −1.4% and VDC +12.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 14.1 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VDC

VDC tracks an index of Consumer Staples. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +12.7% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Consumer Staples 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 66.0%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Oct 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or VDC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and VDC +12.7%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or VDC?
VDC is cheaper, by 0.45 percentage points a year. That is about $45 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against VDC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-vdc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.