Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs IJT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to IJT's +15.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and IJT

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $7.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
+15.4%
IJT total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.18%
IJT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IJT costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 16.8 points.

BOND vs IJT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDIJT
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+15.4%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 20268.2%, high on Aug 4, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.18%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and IJT as of Oct 27, 2026$8.3bn$7.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund9.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and IJT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND IJT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in IJT
VIASAT INC 1.18%
PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS 1.11%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 1.10%
TG THERAPEUTICS 0.97%
ETSY 0.91%
ALKERMES 0.90%
GLAUKOS 0.90%
ZURN ELKAY WATER SOLUTIONS CORP 0.88%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund IJT iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PIMCO iShares
What it is Actively managed Tracks the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +15.4%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) +15.6% (SLYG)
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG −0.2 pts vs SLYG
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.18%
Holdings 1565 369
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and IJT as of Oct 27, 2026 $8.3bn $7.5bn

BOND and IJT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IJT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IJT

IJT tracks the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.4% with distributions reinvested, against +15.6% for its benchmark, the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 369 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 8.2% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or IJT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and IJT +15.4%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or IJT?
IJT is cheaper, by 0.36 percentage points a year. That is about $36 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against IJT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-ijt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.