Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs IGM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to IGM's +21.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and IGM

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $11.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
+21.7%
IGM total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.37%
IGM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IGM costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 23.1 points.

BOND vs IGM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDIGM
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+21.7%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 20266.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.37%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and IGM as of Oct 27, 2026$8.3bn$11.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight92%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund56.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and IGM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND IGM
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in IGM
APPLE 9.36%
MICROSOFT 9.19%
NVIDIA 8.28%
BROADCOM INC 7.07%
ALPHABET CLASS A 4.57%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 4.27%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.16%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 4.07%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PIMCO iShares
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Expanded Tech Sector
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +21.7%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.37%
Holdings 1565 295
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and IGM as of Oct 27, 2026 $8.3bn $11.0bn

BOND and IGM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IGM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IGM

IGM tracks an index of Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +21.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 295 positions, with the top ten at 56.8%. It sat 6.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or IGM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and IGM +21.7%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or IGM?
IGM is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against IGM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-igm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.