Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs GRNY: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to GRNY's +6.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and GRNY

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $4.3bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
+6.5%
GRNY total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.75%
GRNY expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BOND costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.9 points.

BOND vs GRNY: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDGRNY
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+6.5%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 20263.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.75%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and GRNY as of Jul 31, 2026$8.3bn$4.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight98%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund26.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 15, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026 · 101 weekly returns
BOND GRNY
Return
Total return edge GRNY +7.2% +34.7%
Annualized edge GRNY +3.6% +16.6%
Price return edge GRNY −2.9% +34.5%
Risk
Volatility edge BOND 4.9% 19.6%
Max drawdown edge BOND −5.3% −23.1%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge GRNY −0.07 0.68
Sortino edge GRNY −0.08 1.05
Calmar edge GRNY (slight) 0.68 0.72
Reading

GRNY returned more: +34.7% to +7.2%. BOND swung less: 4.9% to 19.6%. BOND fell less at its worst: −5.3% to −23.1%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: BOND vs GRNY: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDGRNYEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+7.2%+34.7%GRNYPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+3.6%+16.6%GRNYTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−2.9%+34.5%GRNYPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility4.9%19.6%BONDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation3.9%12.5%BONDLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−5.3%−23.1%BONDDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe−0.070.68GRNYReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino−0.081.05GRNYReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.680.72GRNY (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 101 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and GRNY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND GRNY
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in GRNY
Arista Networks Inc 2.92%
General Electric Co 2.76%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.66%
Packaging Corp of America 2.66%
PNC Financial Services Group I 2.63%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.61%
Robinhood Markets Inc 2.61%
Bank of New York Mellon Corp 2.59%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +6.5%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.75%
Holdings 1565 43
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and GRNY as of Jul 31, 2026 $8.3bn $4.3bn

BOND and GRNY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-F078BCD3DC

BOND and GRNY do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BOND returned −1.4% and GRNY +6.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 7.9 points.
  3. Number of holdings. BOND holds 1,565 positions and GRNY holds 43.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

GRNY

GRNY is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 43 positions, with the top ten at 26.5%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or GRNY?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and GRNY +6.5%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or GRNY?
BOND is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against GRNY, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-grny

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.