Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
BND vs MNA: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, BND returned +0.2% to MNA's +2.9%, and BND charges 0.03% to MNA's 0.78%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BND and MNA
Net assets: $167.4bn on Oct 31, 2026 for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF, and $252m on Jul 31, 2026 for NYLIM Merger Arbitrage ETF.
Pair scorecard
BND costs 0.75 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.7 points.
| Measure | BND | MNA |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +0.2% | +2.9% |
| Total return, 52 weeks | +2.9% | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index | not published |
| Treasury bills, 52 weeks | +3.7% | |
| Against cash | 0.7 points behind | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.78% |
| Net assets, BND as of Oct 31, 2026 and MNA as of Jul 31, 2026 | $167.4bn | $252m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Risk | ||
| Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns | +0.22 | |
| Beta to the S&P 500 | +0.05: about 0.05% for each 1% | |
| Its average week when the S&P 500 fell | fell 0.00% | |
| Down-week capture | 0.2% | |
| Weeks the S&P 500 fell | 26 of 52, by 1.07% on average | |
Side by side
BND and MNA on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BND
BND tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +0.2% with distributions reinvested, against +0.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, measured by the closely related Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
MNA
MNA is an event driven fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.22 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.05, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.05% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks MNA fell 0.00% on average, a down-week capture of 0.2%. Over the same 52 weeks MNA returned +2.9% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 0.7 percentage points behind cash.
Questions people ask
- Are BND and MNA in the same category?
- BND is a bond ETF and MNA is an alternatives ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, BND or MNA?
- In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned +0.2% and MNA +2.9%.
- Which is cheaper, BND or MNA?
- BND is cheaper, by 0.75 percentage points a year. That is about $75 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BND against MNA, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-mna
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). BND against MNA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-mna
[BND against MNA (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-mna)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.