Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AGG vs MNA: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, AGG returned +0.2% to MNA's +2.9%, and AGG charges 0.03% to MNA's 0.78%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AGG and MNA

Net assets: $139.1bn on Nov 4, 2026 for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF, and $252m on Jul 31, 2026 for NYLIM Merger Arbitrage ETF.

At a glance
+0.2%
AGG total return, 1 year
+2.9%
MNA total return, 1 year
0.03%
AGG expense ratio
0.78%
MNA expense ratio

Pair scorecard

AGG costs 0.75 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.7 points.

AGG vs MNA: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAGGMNA
Return
Total return, 1 year+0.2%+2.9%
Total return, 52 weeks+2.9%
Against its benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Indexnot published
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Against cash0.7 points behind
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.78%
Net assets, AGG as of Nov 4, 2026 and MNA as of Jul 31, 2026$139.1bn$252m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns+0.22
Beta to the S&P 500+0.05: about 0.05% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 0.00%
Down-week capture0.2%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.07% on average

Method

Side by side

AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF MNA NYLIM Merger Arbitrage ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Alternatives ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Event driven
Total return, 1 year +0.2% +2.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +0.2% (SCHZ) not measured
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs SCHZ not measured
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.78%
Holdings 13462 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets, AGG as of Nov 4, 2026 and MNA as of Jul 31, 2026 $139.1bn $252m

AGG and MNA on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

AGG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AGG

AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +0.2% with distributions reinvested, against +0.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

MNA

MNA is an event driven fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.22 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.05, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.05% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks MNA fell 0.00% on average, a down-week capture of 0.2%. Over the same 52 weeks MNA returned +2.9% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 0.7 percentage points behind cash.

Questions people ask

Are AGG and MNA in the same category?
AGG is a bond ETF and MNA is an alternatives ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, AGG or MNA?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned +0.2% and MNA +2.9%.
Which is cheaper, AGG or MNA?
AGG is cheaper, by 0.75 percentage points a year. That is about $75 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AGG against MNA, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-mna

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.