Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BND vs IBB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BND returned −1.3% to IBB's +37.5%, and BND charges 0.03% to IBB's 0.44%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BND and IBB

Net assets: $161.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF, and $11.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Biotechnology ETF.

At a glance
−1.3%
BND total return, 1 year
+37.5%
IBB total return, 1 year
0.03%
BND expense ratio
0.44%
IBB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BND costs 0.41 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 38.8 points; BND is 14.4 times larger.

BND vs IBB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBNDIBB
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.3%+37.5%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Aug 6, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted IndexBiotech
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.44%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$161.4bn$11.2bn
Active share vs the S&P 50099%
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight40%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund50%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BND and IBB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BND IBB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BND
MKTLIQ 0.92%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.40%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.39%
Only in IBB
GILEAD SCIENCES 8.56%
AMGEN INC 8.20%
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS 7.53%
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS 5.64%
MODERNA 5.29%
NATERA 3.85%
ARGENX SE ADR 3.42%
ILLUMINA INC 2.93%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF IBB iShares Biotechnology ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Thematic ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Biotech
Total return, 1 year −1.3% +37.5%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.44%
Holdings 16301 245
Net assets, BND as of Sep 30, 2026 and IBB as of Oct 27, 2026 $161.4bn $11.0bn

BND and IBB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IBB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BND

BND tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, measured by the closely related Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 6, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

IBB

By weight, 40% of IBB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 50% of the fund across 245 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +37.5% with distributions reinvested.

Questions people ask

Are BND and IBB in the same category?
BND is a bond ETF and IBB is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, BND or IBB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned −1.3% and IBB +37.5%.
Which is cheaper, BND or IBB?
BND is cheaper, by 0.41 percentage points a year. That is about $41 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BND against IBB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-ibb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.