Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BITO vs VYM: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BITO returned −30.5% to VYM's +18.0%, and VYM charges 0.04% to BITO's 0.95%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BITO and VYM
Net assets: $1.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for ProShares Bitcoin ETF, and $78.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF.
Pair scorecard
VYM costs 0.91 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 48.5 points; VYM is far larger, $78.9bn against $1.7bn.
| Measure | BITO | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −30.5% | +18.0% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bitcoin futures and swaps on Bitcoin | FTSE High Dividend Yield Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.95% | 0.04% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $1.7bn | $78.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 90% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 26.2% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BITO and VYM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BITO and VYM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BITO and VYM do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. BITO follows Bitcoin futures and swaps on Bitcoin and VYM follows FTSE High Dividend Yield Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BITO returned −30.5% and VYM +18.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 48.5 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
BITO is a registered fund that reaches Bitcoin through what its N-PORT for Aug 31, 2026 lists: Bitcoin futures and swaps on Bitcoin. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, Bitcoin moved −28.3% and BITO returned −30.5%. That leaves it 2.2 percentage points behind. BITO is a registered investment company: it files a monthly N-PORT rather than a 10-K. Its N-PORT for Aug 31, 2026 puts 67.9% of its net assets in ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF.
A holder gets exposure to Bitcoin without the fund holding the coin itself. That difference is the fee, the cost of rolling the futures from one month to the next, what the futures traded at against Bitcoin, and what the market paid for the shares, all of it together. It is the only number on this page the sponsor does not publish itself.
VYM
VYM tracks an index of US high dividend. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 595 positions, with the top ten at 26.2%.
Questions people ask
- Are BITO and VYM in the same category?
- BITO is a crypto futures ETF and VYM is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, BITO or VYM?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BITO returned −30.5% and VYM +18.0%.
- Which is cheaper, BITO or VYM?
- VYM is cheaper, by 0.91 percentage points a year. That is about $91 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BITO against VYM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bito-vs-vym
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BITO against VYM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bito-vs-vym
[BITO against VYM (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bito-vs-vym)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.