Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BITO vs VCLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BITO returned −30.5% to VCLT's −5.9%, and VCLT charges 0.03% to BITO's 0.95%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BITO and VCLT
Net assets: $1.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for ProShares Bitcoin ETF, and $7.5bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
VCLT costs 0.92 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 24.6 points; VCLT is 4.4 times larger.
| Measure | BITO | VCLT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −30.5% | −5.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 17.8%, high on Sep 22, 2021 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bitcoin futures and swaps on Bitcoin | Bloomberg U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Bond Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $1.7bn | $7.5bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BITO and VCLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BITO and VCLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BITO is a registered fund that reaches Bitcoin through what its N-PORT for Aug 31, 2026 lists: Bitcoin futures and swaps on Bitcoin. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, Bitcoin moved −28.3% and BITO returned −30.5%. That leaves it 2.2 percentage points behind. BITO is a registered investment company: it files a monthly N-PORT rather than a 10-K. Its N-PORT for Aug 31, 2026 puts 67.9% of its net assets in ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF.
A holder gets exposure to Bitcoin without the fund holding the coin itself. That difference is the fee, the cost of rolling the futures from one month to the next, what the futures traded at against Bitcoin, and what the market paid for the shares, all of it together. It is the only number on this page the sponsor does not publish itself.
VCLT
VCLT tracks an index of Long-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −5.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 17.8% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are BITO and VCLT in the same category?
- BITO is a crypto futures ETF and VCLT is a bond ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, BITO or VCLT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BITO returned −30.5% and VCLT −5.9%.
- Which is cheaper, BITO or VCLT?
- VCLT is cheaper, by 0.92 percentage points a year. That is about $92 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BITO against VCLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bito-vs-vclt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BITO against VCLT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bito-vs-vclt
[BITO against VCLT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bito-vs-vclt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.