Which returned more over the last year, BITO or LQD?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BITO returned −34.8% and LQD returned −2.7%, so LQD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BITO or LQD?

BITO charges 0.95% a year and LQD charges 0.14%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BITO vs LQD: how they differ

BITO and LQD hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and LQD returned more over the year.

ProShares Bitcoin ETF and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BITO and LQD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BITO	Only in LQD
CME BITCOIN FUT DIGITAL ASSETS 25/SEP/20 81.49%	BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.88%
COINBASE BIT FUT DIGITAL ASSETS 25/SEP/2 14.27%	ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.12%
S&P CME BITCOIN FUTURES DAILY ROLL INDEX 4.24%	DEUTSCHE TELEKOM INTERNATIONAL FIN 0.11%
	CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING L 144A 0.10%
	JPMORGAN CHASE & CO MTN 0.09%
	BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC 0.08%
	MORGAN STANLEY (FXD-FRN) MTN 0.08%
	CITIGROUP INC (FX-FRN) 0.07%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.

BITO and LQD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BITO ProShares Bitcoin ETF	LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	ProShares	iShares
What it is	Bitcoin	US investment grade bonds
Total return, 1 year	−34.8%	−2.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−52.3 pts	−20.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.95%	0.14%
Holdings	3	3149

BITO in plain words

BITO is a digital asset fund tracking the Bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −34.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.95% a year. It sat 40.3% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.

LQD in plain words

LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BITO or LQD?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BITO returned −34.8% and LQD returned −2.7%, so LQD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BITO or LQD?: BITO charges 0.95% a year and LQD charges 0.14%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BITO against LQD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BITO against LQD, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bito-vs-lqd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources