Which returned more over the last year, BITO or EFA?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BITO returned −34.8% and EFA returned +18.2%, so EFA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BITO or EFA?

BITO charges 0.95% a year and EFA charges 0.32%, so EFA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BITO vs EFA: how they differ

BITO and EFA hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EFA returned more over the year.

ProShares Bitcoin ETF and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BITO and EFA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BITO	Only in EFA
CME BITCOIN FUT DIGITAL ASSETS 25/SEP/20 81.49%	ASML HOLDING 3.01%
COINBASE BIT FUT DIGITAL ASSETS 25/SEP/2 14.27%	HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.61%
S&P CME BITCOIN FUTURES DAILY ROLL INDEX 4.24%	ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.36%
	SHELL PLC 1.25%
	MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 1.15%
	NOVARTIS AG 1.15%
	NESTLE SA 1.12%
	ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.09%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.

BITO and EFA on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BITO ProShares Bitcoin ETF	EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	ProShares	iShares
What it is	Bitcoin	Developed markets ex US
Total return, 1 year	−34.8%	+18.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−52.3 pts	+0.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.95%	0.32%
Holdings	3	670

BITO in plain words

BITO is a digital asset fund tracking the Bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −34.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.95% a year. It sat 40.3% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.

EFA in plain words

EFA is an index equity fund tracking the Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 670 positions, with the top ten at 13.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BITO or EFA?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BITO returned −34.8% and EFA returned +18.2%, so EFA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BITO or EFA?: BITO charges 0.95% a year and EFA charges 0.32%, so EFA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BITO against EFA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BITO against EFA, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bito-vs-efa Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources