Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BINC vs XLI: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BINC returned +0.5% to XLI's +10.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BINC and XLI

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $16.8bn for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF and $30.8bn for State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+0.5%
BINC total return, 1 year
+10.2%
XLI total return, 1 year
0.40%
BINC expense ratio
0.08%
XLI expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLI costs 0.32 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.7 points; XLI is 1.8 times larger.

BINC vs XLI: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBINCXLI
Return
Total return, 1 year+0.5%+10.2%
Drawdown
Below its high9.4%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedIndustrial Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.40%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$16.8bn$30.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund24.6%37.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BINC and XLI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BINC XLI
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BINC
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 5.80%
UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 4.50%
TREASURY NOTE (2OLD) 4.34%
UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 2.91%
UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 2.21%
CASH COLLATERAL MORGAN STANLEY & C 1.68%
ISHARES IBOXX $ INV GRADE CORPORAT 0.99%
EUR/USD 0.83%
Only in XLI
CATERPILLAR INC 6.14%
GENERAL ELECTRIC 5.79%
RTX CORP 4.91%
GE VERNOVA INC 4.47%
UNION PACIFIC CORP 3.34%
DEERE + CO 3.01%
EATON CORP PLC 2.79%
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC 2.52%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF XLI State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Industrials
Total return, 1 year +0.5% +10.2%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.6% (SPY)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −3.4 pts vs SPY
Expense ratio 0.40% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 99.9%
Holdings 4690 84
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $16.8bn $30.8bn

BINC and XLI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

BINC and XLI flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BINC

BINC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4,690 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

XLI

XLI tracks an index of Industrials. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 84 positions, with the top ten at 37.8%. It sat 9.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BINC or XLI?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +0.5% and XLI +10.2%.
Which is cheaper, BINC or XLI?
XLI is cheaper, by 0.32 percentage points a year. That is about $32 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do BINC and XLI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of BINC and 100% of XLI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BINC against XLI, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-xli

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.