Which returned more over the last year, BINC or SIVR?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +0.5% and SIVR +15.0%.

Which is cheaper, BINC or SIVR?

SIVR is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

BINC vs SIVR: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

BINC is an actively managed equity fund and SIVR a commodity fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SIVR returned +15.0% against +0.5%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BINC and SIVR

Net assets: $16.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF, and $3.7bn on Oct 28, 2026 for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF.

BINC on its own →SIVR on its own →

At a glance

+0.5%

BINC total return, 1 year

+15.0%

SIVR total return, 1 year

0.40%

BINC expense ratio

0.30%

SIVR expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SIVR costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.5 points.

BINC vs SIVR: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	BINC	SIVR
Return
Measure	BINC	SIVR
Total return, 1 year	+0.5%	+15.0%
Drawdown
Measure	BINC	SIVR
Below its high		53.5%, high on Jan 28, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	BINC	SIVR
What it tracks	No index, actively managed	Silver
Cost and size
Measure	BINC	SIVR
Expense ratio	0.40%	0.30%
Net assets, BINC as of Oct 27, 2026 and SIVR as of Oct 28, 2026	$16.8bn	$3.7bn
Holdings
Measure	BINC	SIVR
Holdings in common	not published
In the S&P 500, by weight	0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	24.6%

Method

Side by side

BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

Where it sits Bond ETF Commodity ETF

Issuer iShares abrdn

What it is Actively managed Holds silver

Total return, 1 year +0.5% +15.0%

Its benchmark over the same days not measured +14.9% (SLV)

Gap to its benchmark not measured +0.1 pts vs SLV

Expense ratio 0.40% 0.30%

Holdings 4690 not counted

Net assets, BINC as of Oct 27, 2026 and SIVR as of Oct 28, 2026 $16.8bn $3.7bn

BINC and SIVR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

BINC

BINC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4,690 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

SIVR

Its expense ratio is 0.30% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

SIVR holds silver. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.0% with distributions reinvested, against +14.9% for its benchmark, the price of silver. It sat 53.5% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BINC or SIVR?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +0.5% and SIVR +15.0%.
Which is cheaper, BINC or SIVR?: SIVR is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Other comparisons

BINC vs USO BINC vs SLV BINC vs GLDM BINC vs IAU IEI vs SIVR SCHP vs SIVR HYG vs SIVR SIVR vs TIP

Where to next

BINC on its own →SIVR on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →BINC dividend history →BINC holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

BINC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

BINC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for BINC ↗

abrdn website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BINC against SIVR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-sivr

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.