Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BINC vs QQQ: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BINC returned +0.5% to QQQ's +15.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BINC and QQQ

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $16.8bn for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF and $483.0bn for Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1.

At a glance
+0.5%
BINC total return, 1 year
+15.2%
QQQ total return, 1 year
0.40%
BINC expense ratio
0.18%
QQQ expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QQQ costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.7 points; QQQ is far larger, $483.0bn against $16.8bn.

BINC vs QQQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBINCQQQ
Return
Total return, 1 year+0.5%+15.2%
Drawdown
Below its high4.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNasdaq-100 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.40%0.18%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$16.8bn$483.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund24.6%46.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BINC and QQQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BINC QQQ
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BINC
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 5.80%
UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 4.50%
TREASURY NOTE (2OLD) 4.34%
UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 2.91%
UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 2.21%
CASH COLLATERAL MORGAN STANLEY & C 1.68%
ISHARES IBOXX $ INV GRADE CORPORAT 0.99%
EUR/USD 0.83%
Only in QQQ
NVIDIA Corp 8.17%
Apple Inc 7.88%
Microsoft Corp 6.14%
Micron Technology Inc 4.50%
Amazon.com Inc 4.25%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.93%
Tesla Inc 3.33%
Alphabet Inc 2.92%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year +0.5% +15.2%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +15.2% (QQQM)
Gap to its benchmark not measured 0.0 pts vs QQQM
Expense ratio 0.40% 0.18%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 95.7%
Holdings 4690 103
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $16.8bn $483.0bn

BINC and QQQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

BINC and QQQ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BINC

BINC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4,690 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

QQQ

QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BINC or QQQ?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +0.5% and QQQ +15.2%.
Which is cheaper, BINC or QQQ?
QQQ is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do BINC and QQQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of BINC and 96% of QQQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BINC against QQQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-qqq

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.