Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BINC vs NBSD: Differences, Returns & Fees
On Jul 31, 2026 BINC's duration was 2.9 years and NBSD's 2.1; NBSD charges 0.35% to BINC's 0.40%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BINC and NBSDNet assets: $16.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF, and $1.2bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Neuberger Short Duration Income ETF.
Pair scorecard
NBSD costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.8 points.
| Measure | BINC | NBSD |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +0.5% | +2.3% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, BINC as of Oct 27, 2026 and NBSD as of Jul 31, 2026 | $16.8bn | $1.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 3% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 24.6% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BINC and NBSD hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.
half
3% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BINC and NBSD on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BINC and NBSD are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 3% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026).
- Number of holdings. BINC holds 4,690 positions and NBSD holds 1058.
- What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
BINC
BINC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4,690 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.
NBSD
NBSD is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BINC or NBSD?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +0.5% and NBSD +2.3%.
- Which is cheaper, BINC or NBSD?
- NBSD is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BINC against NBSD, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-nbsd
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BINC against NBSD. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-nbsd
[BINC against NBSD (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-nbsd)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.