Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BINC vs IWB: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BINC returned +0.5% to IWB's +13.1%; 6% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BINC and IWBNet assets: $16.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF, and $49.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWB costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.6 points; IWB is 2.9 times larger.
| Measure | BINC | IWB |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +0.5% | +13.1% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Russell 1000 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $16.8bn | $48.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 24.6% | 35.3% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BINC and IWB hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
6% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BINC and IWB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BINC
BINC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4,690 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.
IWB
IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BINC or IWB?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +0.5% and IWB +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, BINC or IWB?
- IWB is cheaper, by 0.25 percentage points a year. That is about $25 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BINC against IWB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-iwb
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BINC against IWB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-iwb
[BINC against IWB (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-iwb)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.