BHYB vs PHYL: Differences, Returns & Fees
BHYB's duration was 3.0 years on May 31, 2026 and PHYL's 3.0 on May 29, 2026; BHYB charges 0.20% to PHYL's 0.39%. Net assets on Oct 19, 2026: $3.0bn for Xtrackers USD High Yield BB-B ex Financials ETF and $1.5bn for PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF.
BHYB costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.9 points; BHYB is 2.0 times larger.
| BHYB | PHYL | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | 0.39% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026 | $3.0bn | $1.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +1.7% | +0.8% |
| What it tracks | ICE BofA BB-B Non-FNCL Non-Distressed US HY Constrained Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 33% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
BHYB and PHYL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. BHYB follows ICE BofA BB-B Non-FNCL Non-Distressed US HY Constrained Index and PHYL follows No index, actively managed.
- Holdings in common. 33% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026 and May 29, 2026).
- Cost. BHYB charges 0.20% of assets a year and PHYL 0.39%, a gap of 0.19 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BHYB and PHYL hold 33% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
half
33% in common
On the same fields
BHYB and PHYL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About BHYB
BHYB tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +1.7% with distributions reinvested, against −1.6% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year.
About PHYL
PHYL is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BHYB or PHYL?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BHYB returned +1.7% and PHYL +0.8%.
- Which is cheaper, BHYB or PHYL?
- BHYB is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BHYB against PHYL, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bhyb-vs-phyl
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). BHYB against PHYL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bhyb-vs-phyl
[BHYB against PHYL (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bhyb-vs-phyl)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.