Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BBUS vs CGGR: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BBUS returned +13.1% to CGGR's +2.6%; 39% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BBUS and CGGR
Net assets: $9.7bn on Oct 28, 2026 for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF, and $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
BBUS costs 0.37 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.5 points; CGGR is 2.7 times larger.
| Measure | BBUS | CGGR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.1% | +2.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.02% | 0.39% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $9.7bn | $25.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 39% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 37.6% | 39.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BBUS and CGGR hold 39% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
39% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BBUS and CGGR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BBUS and CGGR are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. BBUS follows Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index and CGGR follows No index, actively managed.
- Holdings in common. 39% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BBUS returned +13.1% and CGGR +2.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.5 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
BBUS
BBUS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.02% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 470 positions, with the top ten at 37.6%.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BBUS or CGGR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BBUS returned +13.1% and CGGR +2.6%.
- Which is cheaper, BBUS or CGGR?
- BBUS is cheaper, by 0.37 percentage points a year. That is about $37 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BBUS against CGGR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bbus-vs-cggr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BBUS against CGGR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bbus-vs-cggr
[BBUS against CGGR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bbus-vs-cggr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.