Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BBMC vs ESML: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BBMC returned +17.6% to ESML's +17.7%; 52% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BBMC and ESML
Net assets: $2.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF, and $2.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF.
Pair scorecard
BBMC costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; ESML is 1.3 times larger.
| Measure | BBMC | ESML |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +17.6% | +17.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 5.2%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 5.3%, high on Aug 14, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Morning- star US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index | MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.17% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $2.1bn | $2.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 52% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 8.1% | 5.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Apr 24, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 339 weekly returnsESML returned slightly more: +165.5% to +159.6%. BBMC swung slightly less: 19.9% to 20.6%. ESML fell slightly less at its worst: −27.6% to −29.2%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | BBMC | ESML | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +159.6% | +165.5% | ESML (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +15.8% | +16.2% | ESML (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +139.6% | +145.3% | ESML (slight) | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 19.9% | 20.6% | BBMC (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 13.1% | 13.5% | BBMC (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −29.2% | −27.6% | ESML (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.68 | 0.68 | Tie | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.04 | 1.04 | Tie | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.54 | 0.59 | ESML (slight) | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 339 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BBMC and ESML hold 52% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
52% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BBMC and ESML on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BBMC and ESML are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. BBMC follows Morning- star US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index and ESML follows MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index.
- Cost. BBMC charges 0.07% of assets a year and ESML 0.17%, a gap of 0.10 points.
- Holdings in common (similar). 52% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
BBMC
BBMC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 21% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 459 positions, with the top ten at 8.1%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
ESML
ESML tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.17% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 12% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 903 positions, with the top ten at 5.2%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BBMC or ESML?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BBMC returned +17.6% and ESML +17.7%.
- Which is cheaper, BBMC or ESML?
- BBMC is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BBMC against ESML, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bbmc-vs-esml
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BBMC against ESML. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bbmc-vs-esml
[BBMC against ESML (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bbmc-vs-esml)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.