Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

ESML vs FYX: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ESML returned +17.7% to FYX's +26.2%; 16% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ESML and FYX

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $2.7bn for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF and $1.4bn for First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund.

At a glance
+17.7%
ESML total return, 1 year
+26.2%
FYX total return, 1 year
0.17%
ESML expense ratio
0.58%
FYX expense ratio

Pair scorecard

ESML costs 0.41 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.5 points; ESML is 1.9 times larger.

ESML vs FYX: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureESMLFYX
Return
Total return, 1 year+17.7%+26.2%
Drawdown
Below its high5.3%, high on Aug 14, 20265.0%, high on Aug 4, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus IndexNasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.17%0.58%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$2.7bn$1.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common16%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.2%3.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 20, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026 · 444 weekly returns
ESML FYX
Return
Total return edge FYX +126.6% +144.8%
Annualized edge FYX (slight) +10.1% +11.1%
Price return edge FYX +104.3% +123.2%
Risk
Volatility edge ESML (slight) 22.8% 25.3%
Max drawdown edge ESML −40.6% −47.6%
Downside capture 104.1% 110.3%
Beta 1.11 1.19
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FYX (slight) 0.41 0.43
Sortino edge FYX (slight) 0.59 0.63
Treynor 0.085 0.086
Calmar edge ESML (slight) 0.25 0.23
Against the benchmark
Alpha −4.4% a year −1.6% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.14 −0.62
Information ratio −0.27 0.02
Tracking error 11.3% 12.0%

Each against its own benchmark: ESML against PBUS, Apr 20, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026; FYX against IWV, May 18, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FYX returned more: +144.8% to +126.6%. ESML swung slightly less: 22.8% to 25.3%. ESML fell less at its worst: −40.6% to −47.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: ESML vs FYX: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureESMLFYXEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+126.6%+144.8%FYXPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.1%+11.1%FYX (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+104.3%+123.2%FYXPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.8%25.3%ESML (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation16.0%17.3%ESML (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−40.6%−47.6%ESMLDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture97.1%122.6%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture104.1%110.3%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.111.19Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.760.78Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.410.43FYX (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.590.63FYX (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0850.086Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.250.23ESML (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkPBUSIWVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−4.4% a year−1.6% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.14−0.62Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−11.9% to +3.2%−6.7% to +3.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.270.02Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error11.3%12.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 444 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

16%

By the books each fund has filed, ESML and FYX hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

16% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ESML FYX
NORTHWEST NATURAL HOLDING COMPANY 0.23% 0.26%
CAREDX 0.18% 0.33%
OPTION CARE HEALTH INC 0.18% 0.17%
YETI HOLDINGS 0.16% 0.19%
HARLEY DAVIDSON 0.15% 0.37%
WORKIVA CLASS A 0.15% 0.23%
BRIGHT HORIZONS FAMILY SOLUTIONS 0.14% 0.14%
BEACON FINANCIAL 0.25% 0.13%
CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES 0.17% 0.13%
CVB FINANCIAL CORP 0.15% 0.13%
FTI CONSULTING 0.13% 0.14%
HOWARD HUGHES HOLDINGS INC 0.13% 0.24%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ESML
MODERNA 1.13%
ASSURANT INC 0.66%
US FOODS HOLDING 0.58%
OVINTIV 0.51%
ONE GAS 0.40%
REVVITY 0.39%
DYNATRACE INC 0.38%
GUARDANT HEALTH 0.38%
Only in FYX
DXC Technology Company 0.45%
Appian Corporation 0.43%
Kohl's Corporation 0.39%
Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. 0.39%
Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. 0.38%
Amplitude, Inc. (Class A) 0.38%
Comstock Resources, Inc. 0.37%
Everforth Incorporated 0.37%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

ESML iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +17.7% +26.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (PBUS) +13.3% (IWV)
Gap to its benchmark +4.4 pts vs PBUS +12.9 pts vs IWV
Expense ratio 0.17% 0.58%
Already in the S&P 500 12.3% 0.0%
Holdings 903 525
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $2.7bn $1.4bn

ESML and FYX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-8950774FD2

ESML and FYX are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. ESML follows MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index and FYX follows Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 16% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 ESML returned +17.7% and FYX +26.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.5 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

ESML and FYX flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ESML

ESML tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.17% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 12% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 903 positions, with the top ten at 5.2%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

FYX

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +26.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.

FYX tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.58% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 525 positions, with the top ten at 3.9%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ESML or FYX?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ESML returned +17.7% and FYX +26.2%.
Which is cheaper, ESML or FYX?
ESML is cheaper, by 0.41 percentage points a year. That is about $41 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ESML and FYX overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 12% of ESML and 0% of FYX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ESML against FYX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/esml-vs-fyx

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.